New Updates

Media

Campaigns

Newsletters

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This email newsletter was sent to you in graphical HTML format.
If you're seeing this version, your email program prefers plain text emails.
You can read the original version online:
http://ymlp286.net/zeL3bq
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

THE ABORIGINAL DISCOUNT FOR HAITIANS?

Canadians were conned by Pierre Trudeau's Charter of Rights and
Freedoms. It promised equality. In fact, while it made it illegal for
mere citizens to discriminate against privileged people -- race,
religion, sex (later sexual orientation) -- it allowed social worker
governments reflecting Frankfurt School cultural communism to
discriminate whenever they wanted. Oh, yes, and always to the
detriment of the Majority.

Sec. 2 of the Charter proclaims:
"2.Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms:
(a) freedom of conscience and religion;
(b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including
freedom of the press and other media of communication;
(c) freedom of peaceful assembly; and
(d) freedom of association."

Sounds good, but most people missed Sec. 1. Where under English Common
Law, our heritage, a citizen had the right to do anything that wasn't
expressly prohibited by law, Trudeau gave us Napoleonic Law under
which a stingy state doles out certain limited rights, which it can
limit and take back. Section 1 makes this clear:

" 1.The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights
and freedoms set out in it subject only to such reasonable limits
prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and
democratic society. " The courts have had a field day with this.
They've decided that, if Parliament or a provincial legislature has a
good goal in mind -- say, shielding privileged minorities form
criticism, they may limit your rights (say, freedom of speech),
provided the limitations are not too extreme and promote the goal in
mind.

The same goes for equality. Sec. 15. says all citizens are equal:
"15.(1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the
right to the equal protection and equal benefit of the law without
discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on
race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental
or physical disability."

Section 15.2 swiftly removes that equality and grants special
privileges to privileged minorities:
"(2) Subsection (1) does not preclude any law, program or activity
that has as its object the amelioration of conditions of disadvantaged
individuals or groups including those that are disadvantaged because
of race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or
mental or physical disability."

Thus, we get anti-White, anti-male "employment equity" or affirmative
action programmes; we get a situation where Indians living on reserves
do not pay taxes other workers must; and where Indians have special
fishing and hunting rights that Whites do not.

This also explains another anti-Majority piece of absurdity the
so-called "Native Discount." Some years ago, legal authorities noticed
that there was a disproportionate number of Indians in Canadian jails.
Under their ideological view of quality, if people are equal, results
should be equal. Indians should be represented in prisons in keeping
with their proportion of the population. Of course, they are heavily
overrepresented for the good reason they commit crimes, especially
violent crime, out of all proportion to their share of the population.
No mystery here.

However, to deal with this affront to the ideology of "equality," it
was decided to try to jigger the results and mandate special
sentencing for Indians. It was deemed they came from a disadvantaged
background (and many Whites don't?). So, they would be entitled to
receive lesser sentences. in consideration of their "special" status.
They would also be eligible to such oddities as "healing circles, " in
lieu of prison time.

This brings us to today's anti-Majority Charter outrage. The Winnipeg
Sun (January 17, 2012) exposed the case of a Haitian murderer who is
now being granted the "native discount" in terms of a parole hearing.
The politically correct tell us there is no such thing as race and
that race is just a "social construct", but they seem to have no
trouble in determining race in order to grant special privileges to
certain minorities. The Sun reports:

"The father of a murdered teen is slamming a decision by parole
officials to grant a Haitian-born man convicted of killing her a
culturally-sensitive parole hearing typically meant for aboriginal
offenders. Michael Manning, the Quebec-based father of Tara Manning,
will be in Winnipeg on Wednesday to attend a parole hearing at Stony
Mountain Institution for Gregory Bromby, the man convicted in 1994 of
her stabbing death. Manning questions a Parole Board of Canada’s
decision to let Bromby, who is not aboriginal, have what’s called an
'elder-assisted hearing.'

'He doesn’t have one bit of aboriginal blood in him. This is a
travesty, a mockery,' Manning told a Montreal radio station prior to
his departure for Winnipeg on Tuesday. ... 'He’s Haitian. Why
doesn’t he have a regular parole hearing?,' Manning asked, adding he
has not been allowed to see any proof of Bromby’s commitment to
aboriginal teachings.
The non-traditional forum factors in Bromby’s participation in
aboriginal programs and spiritual activities while in custody. The
hearing — held in a circle that includes decision-makers, elders and
victims — includes prayers from an aboriginal elder and a
traditional smudge ceremony."

And a final knee in the solar plexus of the victims: "The board
refused comment on the length of Bromby’s involvement with
aboriginal programs while serving his life sentence, citing privacy
issues." Canadians, as usual, are given the mushroom treatment -- kept
in the dark and fed manure. "Privacy" is a great excuse for
bureaucrats to keep taxpayers in the dark.

Paul Fromm
Director
CANADA FIRST IMMIGRATION REFORM COMMITTEE

HAITIAN-BORN KILLER GETS ABORIGINAL PAROLE HEARING

FATHER OF VICTIM CALLS IT 'A TRAVESTY'

By James Turner ( http://www.torontosun.com/jamesturner ) ,Winnipeg
Sun
First posted: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 04:42 PM EST | Updated:
Wednesday, January 18, 2012 03:20 PM EST

(
http://www.torontosun.com/2012/01/17/family-slams-killers-mockeryof-parole-system?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=recommend-button&utm_campaign=Haitian-born+killer+gets+aboriginal+parole+hearing
)

The father of a murdered teen is slamming a decision by parole
officials to grant a Haitian-born man convicted of killing her a
culturally-sensitive parole hearing typically meant for aboriginal
offenders.
Michael Manning, the Quebec-based father of Tara Manning, will be in
Winnipeg on Wednesday to attend a parole hearing at Stony Mountain
Institution for Gregory Bromby, the man convicted in 1994 of her
stabbing death.
Manning questions a Parole Board of Canada’s decision to let Bromby,
who is not aboriginal, have what’s called an “elder-assisted
hearing.”
“He doesn’t have one bit of aboriginal blood in him. This is a
travesty, a mockery,” Manning told a Montreal radio station prior to
his departure for Winnipeg on Tuesday.
Manning could not immediately be reached locally.
“He’s Haitian. Why doesn’t he have a regular parole hearing?,”
Manning asked, adding he has not been allowed to see any proof of
Bromby’s commitment to aboriginal teachings.
The non-traditional forum factors in Bromby’s participation in
aboriginal programs and spiritual activities while in custody.
The hearing — held in a circle that includes decision-makers, elders
and victims — includes prayers from an aboriginal elder and a
traditional smudge ceremony.
A parole board document describes the process as being for First
Nation, Metis and Inuit offenders “that takes into account the
uniqueness of aboriginal culture and heritage.”
Despite this, the parole board says any offender of non-aboriginal
descent is entitled to apply for an elder-assisted parole hearing.
Out of 452 culturally-assisted parole hearings conducted in the
board’s last fiscal year, 52 offenders were of non-aboriginal
descent, said Amy Wood.
It was parole officials who determined Bromby’s commitment to,
engagement with and progress within aboriginal-based programs and
activities while locked up could let him enjoy the alternative format.
The board refused comment on the length of Bromby’s involvement with
aboriginal programs while serving his life sentence, citing privacy
issues.
There is no difference in terms of how an offender’s public risk is
assessed, Wood said.
“The outcome will be the same. It’s just a format,” she said.

_____________________________
Unsubscribe / Change Profile: http://ymlp286.net/ugmjhqsqgsgbbqgeej
Powered by YourMailingListProvider

THE ABORIGINAL DISCOUNT FOR HAITIANS?

Written by Paul Fromm

Monday, 23 January 2012 05:09

THE ABORIGINAL DISCOUNT FOR HAITIANS?

Canadians were conned by Pierre Trudeau's Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
It promised equality. In fact, while it made it illegal for mere
citizens todiscriminate against privileged people -- race, religion,
sex (later sexual
orientation) -- it allowed social worker governments reflecting Frankfurt
School cultural communism to discriminate whenever they wanted. Oh, yes,
and always to the detriment of the Majority.

Sec. 2 of the Charter proclaims:

"*2. *Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms:

(a) freedom of conscience and religion;

(b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom
of the press and other media of communication;

(c) freedom of peaceful assembly; and

(d) freedom of association."

Sounds good, but most people missed Sec. 1. Where under English Common Law,
our heritage, a citizen had the right to do anything that wasn't expressly
prohibited by law, Trudeau gave us Napoleonic Law under which a stingy
state doles out certain limited rights, which it can limit and take back.
Section 1 makes this clear:

" *1. *The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights
and freedoms set out in it subject only to such reasonable limits
prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic
society. " The courts have had a field day with this. They've decided that,
if Parliament or a provincial legislature has a good goal in mind -- say,
shielding privileged minorities form criticism, they may limit your rights
(say, freedom of speech), provided the limitations are not too extreme and
promote the goal in mind.

The same goes for equality. Sec. 15. says all citizens are equal: "*15.** *(1)
Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the
equal protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and,
in particular, without discrimination based on race, national or ethnic
origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability."

Section 15.2 swiftly removes that equality and grants special privileges to
privileged minorities:

"(2) Subsection (1) does not preclude any law, program or activity that has
as its object the amelioration of conditions of disadvantaged individuals
or groups including those that are disadvantaged because of race, national
or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical
disability."

Thus, we get anti-White, anti-male "employment equity" or affirmative
action programmes; we get a situation where Indians living on reserves do
not pay taxes other workers must; and where Indians have special fishing
and hunting rights that Whites do not.

This also explains another anti-Majority piece of absurdity the so-called
"Native Discount." Some years ago, legal authorities noticed that there was
a disproportionate number of Indians in Canadian jails. Under their
ideological view of quality, if people are equal, results should be equal.
Indians should be represented in prisons in keeping with their proportion
of the population. Of course, they are heavily overrepresented for the good
reason they commit crimes, especially violent crime, out of all proportion
to their share of the population. No mystery here.

However, to deal with this affront to the ideology of "equality," it was
decided to try to jigger the results and mandate special sentencing for
Indians. It was deemed they came from a disadvantaged background (and many
Whites don't?). So, they would be entitled to receive lesser sentences. in
consideration of their "special" status. They would also be eligible to
such oddities as "healing circles, " in lieu of prison time.

This brings us to today's anti-Majority Charter outrage. The
*Winnipeg Sun*(January 17, 2012) exposed the case of a Haitian
murderer who is now being
granted the "native discount" in terms of a parole hearing. The politically
correct tell us there is no such thing as race and that race is just a
"social construct", but they seem to have no trouble in determining race in
order to grant special privileges to certain minorities. The *Sun* reports:

"The father of a murdered teen is slamming a decision by parole officials
to grant a Haitian-born man convicted of killing her a culturally-sensitive
parole hearing typically meant for aboriginal offenders. Michael Manning,
the Quebec-based father of Tara Manning, will be in Winnipeg on Wednesday
to attend a parole hearing at Stony Mountain Institution for Gregory Bromby,
the man convicted in 1994 of her stabbing death. Manning questions a Parole
Board of Canada’s decision to let Bromby, who is not aboriginal, have
what’s called an 'elder-assisted hearing.'

'He doesn’t have one bit of aboriginal blood in him. This is a travesty, a
mockery,' Manning told a Montreal radio station prior to his departure for
Winnipeg on Tuesday. ... 'He’s Haitian. Why doesn’t he have a regular
parole hearing?,' Manning asked, adding he has not been allowed to see any
proof of Bromby’s commitment to aboriginal teachings.

The non-traditional forum factors in Bromby’s participation in aboriginal
programs and spiritual activities while in custody. The hearing — held in a
circle that includes decision-makers, elders and victims — includes prayers
from an aboriginal elder and a traditional smudge ceremony."

And a final knee in the solar plexus of the victims: "The board refused
comment on the length of Bromby’s involvement with aboriginal programs
while serving his life sentence, citing privacy issues." Canadians, as
usual, are given the mushroom treatment -- kept in the dark and fed manure.
"Privacy" is a great excuse for bureaucrats to keep taxpayers in the dark.

*Paul Fromm*

*Director*

*CANADA FIRST IMMIGRATION REFORM COMMITTEE*

* *

*Haitian-born killer gets aboriginal parole hearing * Father of victim
calls it 'a travesty'
By James Turner <http://www.torontosun.com/jamesturner> ,Winnipeg Sun

First posted: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 04:42 PM EST | Updated: Wednesday,
January 18, 2012 03:20 PM EST
<http://www.torontosun.com/2012/01/17/family-slams-killers-mockeryof-parole-system?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=recommend-button&utm_campaign=Haitian-born+killer+gets+aboriginal+parole+hearing#>

The father of a murdered teen is slamming a decision by parole officials to
grant a Haitian-born man convicted of killing her a culturally-sensitive
parole hearing typically meant for aboriginal offenders.

Michael Manning, the Quebec-based father of Tara Manning, will be in
Winnipeg on Wednesday to attend a parole hearing at Stony Mountain
Institution for Gregory Bromby, the man convicted in 1994 of her stabbing
death.

Manning questions a Parole Board of Canada’s decision to let Bromby, who is
not aboriginal, have what’s called an “elder-assisted hearing.”

“He doesn’t have one bit of aboriginal blood in him. This is a travesty, a
mockery,” Manning told a Montreal radio station prior to his departure for
Winnipeg on Tuesday.

Manning could not immediately be reached locally.

“He’s Haitian. Why doesn’t he have a regular parole hearing?,” Manning
asked, adding he has not been allowed to see any proof of Bromby’s
commitment to aboriginal teachings.

The non-traditional forum factors in Bromby’s participation in aboriginal
programs and spiritual activities while in custody.

The hearing — held in a circle that includes decision-makers, elders and
victims — includes prayers from an aboriginal elder and a traditional
smudge ceremony.

A parole board document describes the process as being for First Nation,
Metis and Inuit offenders “that takes into account the uniqueness of
aboriginal culture and heritage.”

Despite this, the parole board says any offender of non-aboriginal descent
is entitled to apply for an elder-assisted parole hearing.

Out of 452 culturally-assisted parole hearings conducted in the board’s
last fiscal year, 52 offenders were of non-aboriginal descent, said Amy
Wood.

It was parole officials who determined Bromby’s commitment to, engagement
with and progress within aboriginal-based programs and activities while
locked up could let him enjoy the alternative format.

The board refused comment on the length of Bromby’s involvement with
aboriginal programs while serving his life sentence, citing privacy issues.

There is no difference in terms of how an offender’s public risk is
assessed, Wood said.

“The outcome will be the same. It’s just a format,” she said.

Merlin Miller for President -- On Paul Fromm's "the Fighting Side of Me""

Written by Paul Fromm

Sunday, 22 January 2012 05:20

<< Start < Prev 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 Next > End >>

Page 260 of 454

Media

Campaigns

Newsletters

Most Read