Merlin Miller for President -- Hear Him on "The Fighting Side of Me"

Written by Paul Fromm

Sunday, 22 January 2012 05:11

*You Don't Want to Miss This One: Catch American Third Position Presidential Candidate Merlin Miller on Paul Fromm's "The Fighting Side of Me" Show Tuesday, January 24, 10:00 p.m.* ** *One of the most exciting developments in American nationalist politics in recent years is the formation of the American Third Position, a new political party dedicated to the preservation of the European founding/settler people of the United States. They are offering an amazing ticket -- West Point graduate and movie producer Merlin Miller for president, and Virginia Abernethy, immigration reformer and professor emeritus at Vanderbilt University for vice-president.* ** *I am honoured to interview my friend and fellow member of the Council of Conservative Citizens, Merlin Miller, this Tuesday on my weekly "Fighting Side of Me" show on Freedom Radio.* ** *I hope you can tune in: http://reasonradionetwork.com/* ** ** *Paul Fromm* ** * * *PRESS RELEASE* * * *LOS ANGELES — Jan. 12, 2012 —* The American Third Position has unanimously nominated Merlin Miller, a West Point graduate and veteran independent filmmaker, as our presidential candidate for the 2012 election ( www.merlinmiller2012.com<https://mail.google.com/mail/html/compose/static_files/www.merlinmiller2012.com>). Dr. Virginia Deane Abernethy, Professor Emerita at Vanderbilt University, has been chosen as his running mate for vice president. The American Third Position (A3P) is a rapidly growing political party and the sole representative for traditional white Americans and the restoration of our Republic. A3P is uncompromising in its position that the present political system unquestionably favors the two entrenched parties. Through mass manipulation and corruption, the “Republocrats” have effected their continuation in power. They have also succeeded with their “divide and conquer” tactics that adversely affect white Americans. The current presidential regime, along with all of the regimes in recent memory, has ruined the ideals and institutions of America’s Founding Fathers. If existing government social policies continue, white Americans are projected to become a minority in the U.S within a few decades. This has already happened in a number of states. The American Third Position party believes the time has come for a strong political party that explicitly advocates the interests of white Americans. The character of a nation depends on those who comprise it. A country is the product of its people; if you change the people you inevitably change the character of the country. Each nation has the right to maintain the identity upon which it was founded. Our slate of candidates is morally, ethically and intellectually above those offered by the Democrats or Republicans. Critically, we are lobbying for a proportional representation electoral system at the local, state and national levels. First and foremost A3P proposes a moratorium on immigration and the immediate deportation of illegal immigrants. Similar plans were enacted by President Roosevelt during the Great Depression (1930’s) and by President Eisenhower in the 1950’s. Many European countries have significantly reduced the number of Third World immigrants as well. Additionally, we support fair trade over so-called free trade; private enterprise over government expansionism; sound environmental and energy policies; and an “America First” foreign policy, including the cessation of all military intervention and economic aid abroad. Visit A3P at www.American3rdposition.com<http://www.american3rdposition.com/>for information. The executive leadership is William Johnson, Esq. (Chairman), Don Wassall, Esq., Kevin McDonald, PhD., Dr. Virginia Abernethy, Tomislav Sunic, PhD, James Kelso, Dr. Adrian Krieg, CMFGE, Alexander

 

Spinning Straw Into Gold

Written by Paul Fromm

Saturday, 21 January 2012 06:01

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This email newsletter was sent to you in graphical HTML format. If you're seeing this version, your email program prefers plain text emails. You can read the original version online: http://ymlp302.net/zSCezK -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Spinning Straw Into Gold Forget Canadian pit ponies. After all, they're busy living it up on their quarter-century earnings windfall of $53.00. Our rapacious banks are once again fretting about the plight of newcomers: "Simply paying Canadian immigrants as much as their Canadian peers with similar education levels could be worth as much as $30.7 billion to Canada's economy, the Royal Bank of Canada said in a report Monday morning. 'While Canada has done a great job of attracting foreign talent, integrating newcomers effectively has proven to be more of a challenge,' the report states. More than 40 per cent of those who come to Canada today have a bachelor's degree or better. That's risen from under 14 per cent in 1981, and it compares to 17 per cent among the Canadian-born population today. [Would it be unforgivably subversive to suggest that those numbers might plummet if Canada bothered to weed out fake accreditations before rolling out the welcome mat? That the world has suddenly thrown up a tsunami of degree-bearing dynamos just when Canada admits anyone waving credible looking paperwork is hardly surprising. What is surprising is that so many exquisitely educated individuals from so many institutions of higher learning resisted all temptation to study English. Once here, large numbers withdraw into self-imposed internal exile in monolingual ethnic enclaves. Newsflash: If you can't speak the language of the country in which you reside, you will never amount to anything. Nevertheless, RBC continues to fuss:] If all things were equal, immigrants employed full-time should have earned $57,000 on average, in 2006, RBC said. That implies their actual salaries were 21 per cent below where they should have been. For those who came to Canada very recently, the gap jumps to 56 per cent or about $37,200 per working person. Working to rectify that gap could result in a shot in the arm of about 2.1 per cent of GDP that could be added to the economy in the form of increased wages. ... In addition to wage discrepancies, the report highlights a growing disparity in who's even able to get a job. In 1981, the unemployment rate for immigrants and Canadians as a whole was about the same, at a little under 8 per cent. But by 2006, the rate for immigrants was 6.9 per cent, compared to 6.4 per cent for native Canadians. If typical factors such as education, age, gender, region, and experience were considered, the immigrant unemployment rate should actually be lower than that of Canadian-born people. The 'potential' rate should be as low as 5.4 per cent in 2006, the bank says. Among those who had come to Canada in the past five years, the rate jumped even higher, to 12 per cent." (CBC, December 19, 2011) Could be. should be. might have been -- it's incredible that this doily of speculative rubbish was given column space -- even by the CBC. Naturally, one commentator added this, um, insight: "Canada is producing 'Specialist of a field' e.g Data entry specialist, Payroll specialist, Inventory Specialist, receivable specialist, payable specialist, etc. This is not the case in most of other countries. There people habitual of multitasking their experience makes them over qualified or unsuitable of a kind of job. Most of them get refused for a job due to non-Canadian experience. As I found no difference in working what I do & what others do, i.e. doing tasks accordingly, following rules, meeting dead lines same I was doing in my country, why they refused me? every thing is same but what experience I was not having I realized that I never look at clock for my breaks, I never left my table with work if clock is ticking 5:00 as I will not get paid for extra 10-15 minutes or start refusing any task quarter to 5:00. This was the Canadian experience I was not having but now I have it & I am doing the same." [sic] Er, whatever you say kid. And mind, this is the best this chap can muster when he is sitting quietly, every fibre straining to make himself understood; that is, not multi-tasking, as is his wont. Just one question: Would you want him interpreting your prescription, or monitoring 9-1-1 calls? Worse (possibly), is the Canada Newswire story of the same date: "The report concludes that immigrants tend to possess an [ahem!] observable-skills profile that would usually be associated with higher economic rewards. The population of working-age (16-64) immigrants in Canada is more likely to have a university degree than the Canadian born, and is older, on average." Older. [This article appears in the January, 2012 issue of the CANADIAN IMMIGRATION HOTLINE. Published monthly, the CANADIAN IMMIGRATION HOTLINE is available by subscription for $30 per year. You can subscribe by sending a cheque or VISA number and expiry date to CANADIAN IMMIGRATION HOTLINE, P.O. Box 332, Rexdale, ON., M9W 5L3.] _____________________________ Unsubscribe / Change Profile: http://ymlp302.net/ugmjhqsqgsgbbqgeee Powered by YourMailingListProvider

 

Spinning Straw Into Gold

Written by Paul Fromm

Saturday, 21 January 2012 05:56

*Spinning Straw Into Gold* ** ** Forget Canadian pit ponies. After all, they're busy living it up on their quarter-century earnings windfall of $53.00. Our rapacious banks are once again fretting about the plight of newcomers: "Simply paying Canadian immigrants as much as their Canadian peers with similar education levels could be worth as much as $30.7 billion to Canada's economy, the *Royal Bank of Canada* said in a report Monday morning. 'While Canada has done a great job of attracting foreign talent, integrating newcomers effectively has proven to be more of a challenge,' the report states. More than 40 per cent of those who come to Canada today have a bachelor's degree or better. That's risen from under 14 per cent in 1981, and it compares to 17 per cent among the Canadian-born population today. [*Would it be unforgivably subversive to suggest that those numbers might plummet if Canada bothered to weed out fake accreditations before rolling out the welcome mat?* That the world has suddenly thrown up a tsunami of degree-bearing dynamos just when Canada admits anyone waving credible looking paperwork is hardly surprising. What is surprising is that so many exquisitely educated individuals from so many institutions of higher learning resisted all temptation to study English. Once here, large numbers withdraw into self-imposed internal exile in monolingual ethnic enclaves. Newsflash: If you can't speak the language of the country in which you reside, you will never amount to anything. Nevertheless, *RBC* continues to fuss:] If all things were equal, immigrants employed full-time should have earned $57,000 on average, in 2006, *RBC* said. That implies their actual salaries were 21 per cent below where they should have been. For those who came to Canada very recently, the gap jumps to 56 per cent or about $37,200 per working person. Working to rectify that gap could result in a shot in the arm of about 2.1 per cent of *GDP* that could be added to the economy in the form of increased wages. ... In addition to wage discrepancies, the report highlights a growing disparity in who's even able to get a job. In 1981, the unemployment rate for immigrants and Canadians as a whole was about the same, at a little under 8 per cent. But by 2006, the rate for immigrants was 6.9 per cent, compared to 6.4 per cent for native Canadians. If typical factors such as education, age, gender, region, and experience were considered, the immigrant unemployment rate should actually be lower than that of Canadian-born people. The 'potential' rate should be as low as 5.4 per cent in 2006, the bank says. Among those who had come to Canada in the past five years, the rate jumped even higher, to 12 per cent." (*CBC*, December 19, 2011) Could be. should be. might have been -- it's incredible that this doily of speculative rubbish was given column space -- even by the *CBC*. Naturally, one commentator added this, um, insight: "Canada is producing 'Specialist of a field' e.g Data entry specialist, Payroll specialist, Inventory Specialist, receivable specialist, payable specialist, etc. This is not the case in most of other countries. There people habitual of multitasking their experience makes them over qualified or unsuitable of a kind of job. Most of them get refused for a job due to non-Canadian experience. As I found no difference in working what I do & what others do, i.e. doing tasks accordingly, following rules, meeting dead lines same I was doing in my country, why they refused me? every thing is same but what experience I was not having I realized that I never look at clock for my breaks, I never left my table with work if clock is ticking 5:00 as I will not get paid for extra 10-15 minutes or start refusing any task quarter to 5:00. This was the Canadian experience I was not having but now I have it & I am doing the same." *[sic*] Er, whatever you say kid. And mind, this is the best this chap can muster when he is sitting quietly, every fibre straining to make himself understood; that is, not multi-tasking, as is his wont. Just one question: Would you want him interpreting your prescription, or monitoring 9-1-1 calls? Worse (possibly), is the *Canada Newswire* story of the same date: "The report concludes that immigrants tend to possess an [ahem!] observable-skills profile that would usually be associated with higher economic rewards. The population of working-age (16-64) immigrants in Canada is more likely to have a university degree than the Canadian born, and is older, on average." Older. [This article appears in the January, 2012 issue of the *CANADIAN IMMIGRATION HOTLINE*. Published monthly, the *CANADIAN IMMIGRATION HOTLINE*is available by subscription for $30 per year. You can subscribe by sending a cheque or VISA number and expiry date to *CANADIAN IMMIGRATION HOTLINE*, P.O. Box 332, Rexdale, ON., M9W 5L3.]