Discard No More (Canadians)

Written by Paul Fromm

Sunday, 03 February 2013 01:24

Discard No More (Canadians) Posted on January 24, 2013 *DISCARD NO MORE CANADIANS* *In the past few weeks, the “Idle No More” movement has articulated Canada’s abandonment of its Aboriginal population. Its efforts have definitely caught the public’s attention. But to increase their numbers and their strength, Aboriginals should consider a coalition with Canada’s unemployed and underemployed mainstream population. In varying degrees, Ottawa has abandoned all of them and their interests with its high immigration policy and its Employment Equity laws. * *Aboriginals have chosen the slogan “Idle no More” to describe their refusal to accept the 75 to 90% unemployment many face on Reserves. Slogans for this coalition of “The Abandoned” could be phrases like “Madness No More” (to express the senselessness of high immigration), “Discard Us No More” (to show the treatment of Canadian-born as disposables) or “Holocaust No More” (to indicate Ottawa’s “burnt-offering” of Canadian lives to satisfy the immigration lobby). * *Once again, we point out that many Canadians do not object to some immigration, but they oppose the 250,000 per year intake that has existed since 1991. [The year former immigration czarina Barbara McDougall upped annual intake numbers from 175,000 to a blistering 250,000. Result? Close to six million newcomers in a bare 20 years]* *For all Canadian-born, whether Aboriginal or mainstream, slogans such as “Hire an Immigrant”,”Recognize Credentials” and “Employment Equity” have missed the point about unemployment in Canada. “Employment Equity” has probably caused the most damage. Employment Equity laws were supposed to grant hiring preference to Aboriginals (as well as to Canada’s women, its Disabled and its Visible Minorities). However, in comparison to Aboriginals and the Disabled, these laws have given greater preference to Visible Minority immigrants, most of whom Canada had no economic need for and therefore should never have brought here. To add to the problem, these Visible Minority immigrants have displaced large numbers of Canadian-born, particularly white males. One example of the discarding and displacement is the 14% (and probably closer to 25%) unemployment rate in Canadian youth. * *Employment Equity (a copy of Affirmative Action in the U.S.) was introduced in Canada in 1986 on the recommendation of a report chaired by Rosalie Abella, at that time an Ontario judge. She is currently a member of Canada’s Supreme Court. Her report resulted in Employment Equity laws to promote Preferential Hiring in Canada’s public sector. That campaign has since been followed by a similar campaign in Canada’s private sector. The result of her work has been that probably hundreds of thousands of Visible Minorities have been granted preference in hiring.* *In a reply to Abella, in 1998, Canadian academic Dr. Martin Loney published “The Pursuit of Division : Race, Gender and Preferential Hiring in Canada”. The main point that Martin Loney made in the book was that Abella lacked empirical evidence for her conclusions. For example, Loney stated that some visible minority groups were actually doing better than white Canadians, so it was incorrect to conclude that Visible Minorities suffered from “systemic discrimination”. * *Furthermore, many Canadians who are aware of the effects of her report would say that Employment Equity (EE) legislation has created a much more serious problem because it has institutionalized “systemic discrimination” against Canadian-born white males. * *In summary, the report done by Rosalie Abella has created a Canadian Holocaust. Its inaccurate conclusions have been used to elicit guilt from Canadians, to justify Canada’s high immigration intake and to intimidate those who question that high intake. Its effects may dwarf the effects of the European Holocaust which Abella’s parents escaped. For the record, Abella was born in a Displaced Person’s Camp in Stuttgart, Germany on July 1, 1946. Her family came to Canada as refugees in 1950. * *To make up for the damage that Employment Equity (EE) laws have done, Canada needs to conduct a sweeping investigation to determine the number of people who have been hired because of these ill-considered laws. The legislation has been implemented by not only federal, provincial and municipal governments, but also by much of Canada’s private sector. * *As an introduction, we present a few examples (from data provided by The Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat) of the effects of EE in Canada’s federal civil service. * *As of March 31 1999, about thirteen years after EE laws began, the Public Service of Canada (PSC) employed 178,340 people. Of that total, 91,856 were women, 5124 were Aboriginals, 8137 were people with disabilities, and 10,557 were persons in a Visible Minority Group. No data was available to show the number of women and other groups employed before 1999, but the fact that women in 1999 comprised over half of the total number of federal employees is striking. However, it was already evident that Visible Minorities (most of whom were probably newly-arrived) were being granted more preference than Aboriginals and the Disabled, most of whom were also probably Canadian-born. * *As of March 31, 2011, the Public Service of Canada (PSC) employed 202,631. Of that total, 111,051 were women, 9486 were Aboriginal, 11,388 were Persons with Disabilities, and 22,998 were Visible Minorities. * *It is worth noting that in the 1999–2011 period, the PSC increased in size by 24,291. It is even more worth noting that Visible Minority employees increased by 12,441, about half of the total increase. This significant increase is probably a result of a concerted effort by the Public Service of Canada (the PSC) to hire Visible Minorities. It should be noted that the Visible Minority hiring is possibly even larger than that reported because Visible Minority employees, in applying for a PSC job, do not have to declare that they belong to a Visible Minority. * *Again, the raw numbers also show that Visible Minorities increased their representation much more than Aboriginals and Persons with Disabilities. . * *Many Canadians would agree that the PSC should make a very strong effort to hire Canada’s Aboriginals and its Disabled. However, many would also say that giving preference to Visible Minorities (VM) who are foreign -born. compounds the first mistake of bringing these immigrants here. Most Canadians correctly believe that access to a job is an essential part of being born here. Similarly, they think that Canada should not be acting as an employment agency for the world’s unemployed. By doing this, Canada inevitably denies jobs to Canadian-born. * *Another major concern that Canadians have about Employment Equity is security. It is common sense that Canada should be very cautious about people who come from countries which are interested in acquiring secret, strategic information about Canadian high tech and resource businesses, or about Canada and its NATO allies. But there is little evidence that Canada has exercised caution is employing these people in sensitive departments. * *For example, it is worthwhile noting that the percentage of Visible Minorities (VM) in departments such as Citizenship and Immigration is high. This department makes major immigration policy decisions, issues visas, and is supposed to uphold the interests of Mainstream Canada. Yet, the percentage of Visible Minorities is 18.8% (850 of a total of 4514 employees). How much is the presence of these VM employees stifling the expression of very real concerns that mainstream Canadian Citizenship and Immigration employees have? * *In the Passport Department, where fraud has been a serious problem in the past, the percentage of Visible Minorities is 19.5% (478 of a total of 2447 employees). Anyone who has visited the Richmond, B.C. Passport Office will be shocked to see that the staff is overwhelmingly probably newly-arrived Chinese. Has this increased the potential for fraud?* *On the Immigration and Refugee Board, where crucial decisions are being made about whether someone is to be granted refugee status and eventual permission to bring in very large numbers of potentially fake relatives, the percentage of Visible.Minorities is 26.8% (223 of a total of 833 employees). Has anyone asked a question about this? * *The percentage of Visible Minorities in Human Resources and Skills Development may seem small at 12.7% , but note that this translates to 2935 of a total of 23,092 employees. This large number is part of a department which allowed close to 400,000 Temporary Foreign Workers (TFW’s) to work here in 2012. In the past few months, Canadians have learned that this department has permitted Mainland Chinese miners to be stealthily imported to fill TFW jobs which several hundred Canadian applicants were denied. This case should make clearer the point that employers are probably widely abusing the TFW program. Have some employees with ethnic connections to these employers assisted some of these employers?* *The percentage of Visible Minorities employed in the Canada Border Services Agency is also 12.7%, but the raw number is high (1750 out of a total of 13,831 employees). This department is responsible for investigating immigration fraud. It is no exaggeration to say that immigration fraud is rampant, mainly because the backgrounds of most of the immigrants who enter Canada are not being checked. We know that even when fraud is reported, this department does not even bother to investigate a very large amount of it. Has this department ever asked whether the loyalties of some of its employees are more to their country of origin than to Canada? * *In summary, a sweeping investigation of the entire Employment Equity program would give Canadians a much better picture of what has occurred and probably produce convincing evidence that the Visible Minority section of EE should never have been implemented and should be ended ASAP. [IMMIGRATION WATCH, January 24, 2013]*

 

Free Speech Lawyer Sylvia Stolz Threatened With Prosecution in Switzerland

Written by Paul Fromm

Saturday, 02 February 2013 04:55

Free Speech Lawyer Sylvia Stolz Threatened With Prosecution in Switzerland *A great woman. Miss Stolz was sentenced to three years and three months in prison for her spirited defence of political prisoner Ernst Zundel in 2005*. On November 24, she was a guest speaker at the 8th Anti-Censorship Conference held in Chur, Switzerland. She spoke of the difficulties lawyers have in defending Europe's new heretics -- those who express doubts about the so-called holocaust. One can deny God, even deny science, believe in creatures from outer space, but to question Europe's new state religion of holocaust is to invite persecution, heavy fines or prison. She reflected on the fact that "holocaust" is not clearly defined and that many of the tenets of this new religion have not actually been proven in court. Well, all hell broke loose. The organizers of the Civic Hall at which the meeting was held have been told they cannot rent it again. An investigation is under way to see whether any "far right" literature was distributed. In this video Sylvia Stolz explains that "far right" is widely used by the politically correct to label any nationalist who stands up for his "*volk"*or people. Now, there are calls for criminal charges of "casting doubt on the holocaust" to be laid against Miss Stolz and conference organizer Ivo Sasek. Already, a Swiss lawyer has filed a complaint against Miss Stolz. A politically correct Inquisition holds sway over much of Europe, where a new secular religion -- another group's tribal history, is imposed upon the populace. Anyone who suggests that some of the religion's claims seem exaggerated or impossible is not argued with but prosecuted and jailed. Further, any lawyer too vigorous in the heretic's defence faces jail or disbarment. A new Dark Age has descended over a Europe that grins like the village idiot (or, perhaps, more politically correctly 'mentally challenged person') and considers itself a champion of democracy and human rights. In this video (English sub-titles) German lawyer Sylvia Stolz replies to her critics as rumours swirl that she will be charged (again) with 'Holocaust Denial' for a speech she gave at an anti-censorship conference in November 2012. <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2gJvE_1HQPg> <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2gJvE_1HQPg> <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2gJvE_1HQPg> [image: Photo: Sylvia Stolz, German Political Prisoner and Lawyer] <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2gJvE_1HQPg> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YS2jMBFIcoU&feature=player_embedded YouTube

 

Canadian Human Rights Commission Spreads Lies and Anti-White Guilt

Written by Paul Fromm

Friday, 01 February 2013 11:42

Canadian Human Rights Commission Spreads Lies and Anti-White Guilt The passage below is from a document* Human Rights in Canada: A Historical Perspective* that is on the website of the Canadian Human Rights Commission. It contains outright historical lies and is nothing but the usual anti-White guilt mongering politically correct poison. Sadly, the Canadian Majority has to pay for this. Even the title of this section reveals anti-White bias: "the plight of immigrants" Really? These people were not kidnapped or press ganged. They eagerly and willingly came to Canada to seek a new life and opportunity in a land that offered them a chance and, not like today, a handout, The article states: "Immigration is funnelled to the West in order to settle and farm the wide tracts of Prairie land. The profile of the preferred immigrant is white and British; as stated by Minister Clifford Sifton, "*stalwart peasants in sheepskin coats*". If British immigrants are not available, other white immigrants will do. White immigrants from Eastern Europe are reluctantly accepted in large numbers." Outright lies. In fact, English settlers were most decidely *not* wanted in Western Canada where they were widely seen as effete and dilettantes. This mendacious piece of White bashing reworks Minister of the Interior Clifford Sifton's great comment about Ukrainians -- "*stalwart peasants in sheepskin coats*" -- so that it seems to refer to the English! In this stunning misdirection, the author distorts the fact that Sifton was praising and welcoming the Ukrainians. http://www.chrc-ccdp.ca/en/getBriefed/1900/immigrants.asp<http://upload.facebook.com/l.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.chrc-ccdp.ca%2Fen%2FgetBriefed%2F1900%2Fimmigrants.asp&h=dAQGe0BqX&s=1>See More [image: Photo: Canadian Human Rights Commission Spreads Lies and Anti-White Guilt The passage below is from a document Human Rights in Canada: A Historical Perspective that is on the website of the Canadian Human Rights Commission. It contains outright historical lies and is nothing but the usual anti-White guilt mongering politically correct poison. Sadly, the Canadian Majority has to pay for this. Even the title of this section reveals anti-White bias: "the plight of immigrants" Really? These people were not kidnapped or press ganged. They eagerly and willingly came to Canada to seek a new life and opportunity in a land that offered them a chance and, not like today, a handout, The article states: "Immigration is funnelled to the West in order to settle and farm the wide tracts of Prairie land. The profile of the preferred immigrant is white and British; as stated by Minister Clifford Sifton, "stalwart peasants in sheepskin coats". If British immigrants are not available, other white immigrants will do. White immigrants from Eastern Europe are reluctantly accepted in large numbers." Outright lies. In fact, English settlers were most decidely not wanted in Western Canada where they were widely seen as effete and dilettantes. This mendacious piece of Whit ebashing reworks Minister of the Interior Clifford Sifton's great comment about Ukrainians -- "stalwart peasants in sheepskin coats" -- so that it seems to refer to the English! In this stunning misdirection, the author distorts the fact that Sifton was praising and welcoming the Ukrainians. The article then trots out the usual discrimination smear: "Originally, male Chinese labourers were allowed into Canada to work for low wages in British Columbia's gold mines and on the trans-Canada railroad. They sent most of their earnings back to China to help support their families. Chinese workers will accept lower wages than white workers." Yet, the Chinese continued to pour into Canada, despite the low wages. They saw Canada offering desirable advantages and opportunities. Indeed, early Chinese called Canada Gum Shan or "Gold Mountain." Wikipedia notes: "British Columbia came to be referred to as "Gold Mountain" following the discovery of gold in the Fraser Canyon in the 1850s and the spread of Chinese settlers in British Columbia (which they also referred to as "The Colonies of T'ang" i.e. China." This latter sentence suggests that the European population of British Columbia, then quite sparse, had every reason to fear the Oriental influx. One sentence -- that's all there is in "Organized Hate" -- labels any opposition to the mass Asiatic invasion as "hate" : "The San Francisco-based Asiatic Exclusion League, dedicated to preventing Asian immigration to America, opens up a number of new chapters in Canadian cities such as Vancouver. Victoria has its own Anti-Chinese Association." So, any effort to prevent one's homeland from being radically changed is "hate." White suicide is good; efforts to preserve the European character of one's country are bad, no "hate"! This passage clearly demonstrates the truth that "anti-racism" is a fraud and is really anti-White. For a more accurate discussion and description of the Asiatic Exclusion League's activities in British Columbia before World War I, you might consult one of the booklets below. C-FAR is proud to have published three booklets by the Bob Jarvis about the Komagata Maru and the opposition to mass Asiatic immigration. You may wish to buy them and order them from C-FAR Books, P.O. Box 332, Rexdale, ON., M9W 5L3, CANADA. __ The Workingman's Revolt": The Vancouver Asiatic Exclusion Rally of 1907 by Robert Jarvis. The fascinating story of the broad-based and, indeed, union-led protests against mass, uncontrolled Asiatic immigration to British Columbia. $5.00 ___ The Komagata Maru Incident: A Canadian Immigration Battle Revisited by Robert Jarvis. The story of an intrepid government undercover agent William Hopkinson, who infiltrated Sikh radicals and developed the information that led the government to expel the Komagata Maru illegals in the summer of 1914. Shortly, afterwards Hopkinson was assassinated by a Sikh terrorist, Mewa Singh, whose portrait still hangs in some Sikh gurdwaras in Vancouver. $5.00 ___Harry Stevens: Immigration Reformer, Reconstructionist, Canada Firster by Robert Jarvis. the story of a real Canadian hero and immigration reformer who, as a young MP, helped stir the Dominion Government to expel the shipload of Indian illegals on the Komagata Maru in 1914. $6.00 The Plight of Immigrants From 1867-1891, Canada was open for business, from an immigrant's point of view. There weren't many restrictions on who could enter the country, except for a head tax on Chinese immigrants, which was introduced in 1885. Eastern and Central Canada was the destination of choice, with British Columbia attracting many people from Asia. By 1900, Minister of the Interior Clifford Sifton's immigration policy is more restrictive. Immigration is funnelled to the West in order to settle and farm the wide tracts of Prairie land. The profile of the preferred immigrant is white and British; as stated by Minister Clifford Sifton, "stalwart peasants in sheepskin coats". If British immigrants are not available, other white immigrants will do. White immigrants from Eastern Europe are reluctantly accepted in large numbers, but black and Asian immigration is discouraged. Chinese immigrants are subject to a head tax, which requires every Chinese immigrant to pay a special $50 tax upon entering the country. Although relatively few in number - there are only 23,000 Chinese people in Canada in 1900 - arrivals from Asian countries are resented by the white majority. Originally, male Chinese labourers were allowed into Canada to work for low wages in British Columbia's gold mines and on the trans-Canada railroad. They sent most of their earnings back to China to help support their families. Chinese workers will accept lower wages than white workers, and this causes resentment in the white population, especially when jobs are scarce. The populace generally perceives Chinese people to be immoral opium addicts. There is no official policy restricting Blacks from entering Canada, but the unofficial policy is to discourage it whenever possible. As a result, there are far fewer black immigrants than there may have been otherwise. In 1899, Canada admitted 44,543 immigrants. Between 1894 and 1899, 154,613 immigrants came to call Canada home. In the five year period between 1991 and 1996, well over 1,000,000 immigrants will arrive. Between 1896 and 1907, Canada admitted 1.3 million European and American immigrants. Less than 900 Blacks were included in that number. In fact, the black population of Canada decreased from 50,000 in 1860 to 17,000 in 1911. In the lumber industry, Chinese workers are paid only between 25% and 50% of the wages paid to white labourers for the same work. Organized Hate The San Francisco-based Asiatic Exclusion League, dedicated to preventing Asian immigration to America, opens up a number of new chapters in Canadian cities such as Vancouver. Victoria has its own Anti-Chinese Association. http://www.chrc-ccdp.ca/en/getBriefed/1900/immigrants.asp] <https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=136774349822147&set=a.102988609867388.7682.100004687473766&type=1&relevant_count=1> Like <https://www.facebook.com/frederick.fromm.3#> · · Share<https://www.facebook.com/ajax/sharer/?s=2&appid=2305272732&p%5B0%5D=100004687473766&p%5B1%5D=204054> The article then trots out the usual discrimination smear: "Originally, male Chinese labourers were allowed into Canada to work for low wages in British Columbia's gold mines and on the trans-Canada railroad. They sent most of their earnings back to China to help support their families. Chinese workers will accept lower wages than white workers." Yet, the Chinese continued to pour into Canada, despite the low wages. They saw Canada offering desirable advantages and opportunities. Indeed, early Chinese called Canada Gum Shan or "Gold Mountain." Wikipedia notes: "British Columbia <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Columbia> came to be referred to as "Gold Mountain" following the discovery of gold in the Fraser Canyon <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fraser_Canyon> in the 1850s and the spread of Chinese settlers in British Columbia (which they also referred to as "*The Colonies of T'ang*" i.e. China." This latter sentence suggests that the European population of British Columbia, then quite sparse, had every reason to fear the Oriental influx. One sentence -- that's all there is in "Organized Hate" -- labels any opposition to the mass Asiatic invasion as "hate" : "The San Francisco-based Asiatic Exclusion League, dedicated to preventing Asian immigration to America, opens up a number of new chapters in Canadian cities such as Vancouver. Victoria has its own Anti-Chinese Association." So, any effort to prevent one's homeland from being radically changed is "hate." White suicide is good; efforts to preserve the European character of one's country are bad, no "hate"! This passage clearly demonstrates the truth that "anti-racism" is a fraud and is really anti-White. For a more accurate discussion and description of the Asiatic Exclusion League's activities in British Columbia before World War I, you might consult one of the booklets below. *C-FAR is proud to have published three booklets by the Bob Jarvis about the Komagata Maru and the opposition to mass Asiatic immigration. You may wish to buy them and order them from C-FAR Books, P.O. Box 332, Rexdale, ON., M9W 5L3, CANADA.* *__ The Workingman's Revolt": The Vancouver Asiatic Exclusion Rally of 1907 * by Robert Jarvis. The fascinating story of the broad-based and, indeed, union-led protests against mass, uncontrolled Asiatic immigration to British Columbia. $5.00 *___ The Komagata Maru Incident: A Canadian Immigration Battle Revisited*by Robert Jarvis. The story of an intrepid government undercover agent William Hopkinson, who infiltrated Sikh radicals and developed the information that led the government to expel the *Komagata Maru* illegals in the summer of 1914. Shortly, afterwards Hopkinson was assassinated by a Sikh terrorist, Mewa Singh, whose portrait still hangs in some Sikh gurdwaras in Vancouver. $5.00 *___Harry Stevens: Immigration Reformer, Reconstructionist, Canada Firster*by Robert Jarvis. the story of a real Canadian hero and immigration reformer who, as a young MP, helped stir the Dominion Government to expel the shipload of Indian illegals on the *Komagata Maru* in 1914. $6.00 *The Plight of Immigrants* * From 1867-1891, Canada was open for business, from an immigrant's point of view. There weren't many restrictions on who could enter the country, except for a head tax on Chinese immigrants, which was introduced in 1885. Eastern and Central Canada was the destination of choice, with British Columbia attracting many people from Asia. * ** *By 1900, Minister of the Interior Clifford Sifton's immigration policy is more restrictive. * *Immigration is funnelled to the West in order to settle and farm the wide tracts of Prairie land. The profile of the preferred immigrant is white and British; as stated by Minister Clifford Sifton, "stalwart peasants in sheepskin coats". If British immigrants are not available, other white immigrants will do. White immigrants from Eastern Europe are reluctantly accepted in large numbers, but black and Asian immigration is discouraged. Chinese immigrants are subject to a head tax, which requires every Chinese immigrant to pay a special $50 tax upon entering the country. Although relatively few in number - there are only 23,000 Chinese people in Canada in 1900 - arrivals from Asian countries are resented by the white majority. Originally, male Chinese labourers were allowed into Canada to work for low wages in British Columbia's gold mines and on the trans-Canada railroad. They sent most of their earnings back to China to help support their families. Chinese workers will accept lower wages than white workers, and this causes resentment in the white population, especially when jobs are scarce. The populace generally perceives Chinese people to be immoral opium addicts. There is no official policy restricting Blacks from entering Canada, but the unofficial policy is to discourage it whenever possible. As a result, there are far fewer black immigrants than there may have been otherwise.* ** *In 1899, Canada admitted 44,543 immigrants. Between 1894 and 1899, 154,613 immigrants came to call Canada home. In the five year period between 1991 and 1996, well over 1,000,000 immigrants will arrive. Between 1896 and 1907, Canada admitted 1.3 million European and American immigrants. Less than 900 Blacks were included in that number. In fact, the black population of Canada decreased from 50,000 in 1860 to 17,000 in 1911. In the lumber industry, Chinese workers are paid only between 25% and 50% of the wages paid to white labourers for the same work. * ***Organized Hate* * The San Francisco-based Asiatic Exclusion League, dedicated to preventing Asian immigration to America, opens up a number of new chapters in Canadian cities such as Vancouver. Victoria has its own Anti-Chinese Association.* ** * * *http://www.chrc-ccdp.ca/en/getBriefed/1900/immigrants.asp*<http://www.chrc-ccdp.ca/en/getBriefed/1900/immigrants.asp>