New Updates

Media

Campaigns

Newsletters

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This email newsletter was sent to you in graphical HTML format.
If you're seeing this version, your email program prefers plain text emails.
You can read the original version online:
http://ymlp257.net/z2b99Z
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CANADIAN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION SPREADS LIES AND ANTI-WHITE GUILT

THE PASSAGE BELOW IS FROM A DOCUMENT HUMAN RIGHTS IN CANADA: A
HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE THAT IS ON THE WEBSITE OF THE CANADIAN HUMAN
RIGHTS COMMISSION. IT CONTAINS OUTRIGHT HISTORICAL LIES AND IS NOTHING
BUT THE USUAL ANTI-WHITE GUILT MONGERING POLITICALLY CORRECT POISON.
SADLY, THE CANADIAN MAJORITY HAS TO PAY FOR THIS.

Even the title of this section reveals anti-White bias: "the plight of
immigrants" Really? These people were not kidnapped or press ganged.
They eagerly and willingly came to Canada to seek a new life and
opportunity in a land that offered them a chance and, not like today,
a handout,

The article states: "Immigration is funnelled to the West in order to
settle and farm the wide tracts of Prairie land. The profile of the
preferred immigrant is white and British; as stated by Minister
Clifford Sifton, "stalwart peasants in sheepskin coats". If British
immigrants are not available, other white immigrants will do. White
immigrants from Eastern Europe are reluctantly accepted in large
numbers." Outright lies. In fact, English settlers were most decidely
not wanted in Western Canada where they were widely seen as effete and
dilettantes. This mendacious piece of White bashing reworks Minister
of the Interior Clifford Sifton's great comment about Ukrainians --
"stalwart peasants in sheepskin coats" -- so that it seems to refer to
the English! In this stunning misdirection, the author distorts the
fact that Sifton was praising and welcoming the
Ukrainians.http://www.chrc-ccdp.ca/en/getBriefed/1900/immigrants.aspSee
More

Like ( https://www.facebook.com/frederick.fromm.3 ) · · Share (
https://www.facebook.com/ajax/sharer/?s=2&appid=2305272732&p%5B0%5D=100004687473766&p%5B1%5D=204054
)

The article then trots out the usual discrimination smear:
"Originally, male Chinese labourers were allowed into Canada to work
for low wages in British Columbia's gold mines and on the trans-Canada
railroad. They sent most of their earnings back to China to help
support their families. Chinese workers will accept lower wages than
white workers." Yet, the Chinese continued to pour into Canada,
despite the low wages. They saw Canada offering desirable advantages
and opportunities. Indeed, early Chinese called Canada Gum Shan or
"Gold Mountain." Wikipedia notes: "British Columbia (
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Columbia ) came to be referred
to as "Gold Mountain" following the discovery of gold in the Fraser
Canyon ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fraser_Canyon ) in the 1850s and
the spread of Chinese settlers in British Columbia (which they also
referred to as "The Colonies of T'ang" i.e. China." This latter
sentence suggests that the European population of British Columbia,
then quite sparse, had every reason to fear the Oriental influx.

One sentence -- that's all there is in "Organized Hate" -- labels any
opposition to the mass Asiatic invasion as "hate" : "The San
Francisco-based Asiatic Exclusion League, dedicated to preventing
Asian immigration to America, opens up a number of new chapters in
Canadian cities such as Vancouver. Victoria has its own Anti-Chinese
Association." So, any effort to prevent one's homeland from being
radically changed is "hate." White suicide is good; efforts to
preserve the European character of one's country are bad, no "hate"!
This passage clearly demonstrates the truth that "anti-racism" is a
fraud and is really anti-White.

For a more accurate discussion and description of the Asiatic
Exclusion League's activities in British Columbia before World War I,
you might consult one of the booklets below.

C-FAR is proud to have published three booklets by the Bob Jarvis
about the Komagata Maru and the opposition to mass Asiatic
immigration. You may wish to buy them and order them from C-FAR
Books, P.O. Box 332, Rexdale, ON., M9W 5L3, CANADA.

__ The Workingman's Revolt": The Vancouver Asiatic Exclusion Rally of
1907 by Robert Jarvis. The fascinating story of the broad-based and,
indeed, union-led protests against mass, uncontrolled Asiatic
immigration to British Columbia. $5.00

___ The Komagata Maru Incident: A Canadian Immigration Battle
Revisited by Robert Jarvis. The story of an intrepid government
undercover agent William Hopkinson, who infiltrated Sikh radicals and
developed the information that led the government to expel the
Komagata Maru illegals in the summer of 1914. Shortly, afterwards
Hopkinson was assassinated by a Sikh terrorist, Mewa Singh, whose
portrait still hangs in some Sikh gurdwaras in Vancouver. $5.00

___Harry Stevens: Immigration Reformer, Reconstructionist, Canada
Firster by Robert Jarvis. the story of a real Canadian hero and
immigration reformer who, as a young MP, helped stir the Dominion
Government to expel the shipload of Indian illegals on the Komagata
Maru in 1914. $6.00

THE PLIGHT OF IMMIGRANTS

From 1867-1891, Canada was open for business, from an immigrant's
point of view. There weren't many restrictions on who could enter the
country, except for a head tax on Chinese immigrants, which was
introduced in 1885. Eastern and Central Canada was the destination of
choice, with British Columbia attracting many people from Asia.

By 1900, Minister of the Interior Clifford Sifton's immigration policy
is more restrictive.
Immigration is funnelled to the West in order to settle and farm the
wide tracts of Prairie land. The profile of the preferred immigrant is
white and British; as stated by Minister Clifford Sifton, "stalwart
peasants in sheepskin coats". If British immigrants are not available,
other white immigrants will do. White immigrants from Eastern Europe
are reluctantly accepted in large numbers, but black and Asian
immigration is discouraged. Chinese immigrants are subject to a head
tax, which requires every Chinese immigrant to pay a special $50 tax
upon entering the country. Although relatively few in number - there
are only 23,000 Chinese people in Canada in 1900 - arrivals from Asian
countries are resented by the white majority. Originally, male Chinese
labourers were allowed into Canada to work for low wages in British
Columbia's gold mines and on the trans-Canada railroad. They sent most
of their earnings back to China to help support their families.
Chinese workers will accept lower wages than white workers, and this
causes resentment in the white population, especially when jobs are
scarce. The populace generally perceives Chinese people to be immoral
opium addicts. There is no official policy restricting Blacks from
entering Canada, but the unofficial policy is to discourage it
whenever possible. As a result, there are far fewer black immigrants
than there may have been otherwise.

In 1899, Canada admitted 44,543 immigrants. Between 1894 and 1899,
154,613 immigrants came to call Canada home. In the five year period
between 1991 and 1996, well over 1,000,000 immigrants will arrive.
Between 1896 and 1907, Canada admitted 1.3 million European and
American immigrants. Less than 900 Blacks were included in that
number. In fact, the black population of Canada decreased from 50,000
in 1860 to 17,000 in 1911. In the lumber industry, Chinese workers are
paid only between 25% and 50% of the wages paid to white labourers for
the same work.

ORGANIZED HATE

The San Francisco-based Asiatic Exclusion League, dedicated to
preventing Asian immigration to America, opens up a number of new
chapters in Canadian cities such as Vancouver. Victoria has its own
Anti-Chinese Association.

http://www.chrc-ccdp.ca/en/getBriefed/1900/immigrants.asp (
http://www.chrc-ccdp.ca/en/getBriefed/1900/immigrants.asp )

_____________________________
Unsubscribe / Change Profile: http://ymlp257.net/ugmjhqsqgsgbbqgwmjgguewwmw
Powered by YourMailingListProvider

Discard No More (Canadians)

Written by Paul Fromm

Sunday, 03 February 2013 20:10

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This email newsletter was sent to you in graphical HTML format.
If you're seeing this version, your email program prefers plain text emails.
You can read the original version online:
http://ymlp257.net/zetJhv
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

DISCARD NO MORE (CANADIANS)

Posted onJanuary 24, 2013

DISCARD NO MORE CANADIANS
In the past few weeks, the “Idle No More” movement has articulated
Canada’s abandonment of its Aboriginal population. Its efforts have
definitely caught the public’s attention. But to increase their
numbers and their strength, Aboriginals should consider a coalition
with Canada’s unemployed and underemployed mainstream population. In
varying degrees, Ottawa has abandoned all of them and their interests
with its high immigration policy and its Employment Equity laws.

Aboriginals have chosen the slogan “Idle no More” to describe
their refusal to accept the 75 to 90% unemployment many face on
Reserves. Slogans for this coalition of “The Abandoned” could be
phrases like “Madness No More” (to express the senselessness of
high immigration), “Discard Us No More” (to show the treatment of
Canadian-born as disposables) or “Holocaust No More” (to indicate
Ottawa’s “burnt-offering” of Canadian lives to satisfy the
immigration lobby).

Once again, we point out that many Canadians do not object to some
immigration, but they oppose the 250,000 per year intake that has
existed since 1991. [The year former immigration czarina Barbara
McDougall upped annual intake numbers from 175,000 to a blistering
250,000. Result? Close to six million newcomers in a bare 20 years]

For all Canadian-born, whether Aboriginal or mainstream, slogans such
as “Hire an Immigrant”,”Recognize Credentials” and
“Employment Equity” have missed the point about unemployment in
Canada. “Employment Equity” has probably caused the most damage.
Employment Equity laws were supposed to grant hiring preference to
Aboriginals (as well as to Canada’s women, its Disabled and its
Visible Minorities). However, in comparison to Aboriginals and the
Disabled, these laws have given greater preference to Visible
Minority immigrants, most of whom Canada had no economic need for and
therefore should never have brought here. To add to the problem, these
Visible Minority immigrants have displaced large numbers of
Canadian-born, particularly white males. One example of the discarding
and displacement is the 14% (and probably closer to 25%) unemployment
rate in Canadian youth.

Employment Equity (a copy of Affirmative Action in the U.S.) was
introduced in Canada in 1986 on the recommendation of a report chaired
by Rosalie Abella, at that time an Ontario judge. She is currently a
member of Canada’s Supreme Court. Her report resulted in Employment
Equity laws to promote Preferential Hiring in Canada’s public
sector. That campaign has since been followed by a similar campaign in
Canada’s private sector. The result of her work has been that
probably hundreds of thousands of Visible Minorities have been granted
preference in hiring.

In a reply to Abella, in 1998, Canadian academic Dr. Martin Loney
published “The Pursuit of Division : Race, Gender and Preferential
Hiring in Canada”. The main point that Martin Loney made in the
book was that Abella lacked empirical evidence for her conclusions.
For example, Loney stated that some visible minority groups were
actually doing better than white Canadians, so it was incorrect to
conclude that Visible Minorities suffered from “systemic
discrimination”.

Furthermore, many Canadians who are aware of the effects of her report
would say that Employment Equity (EE) legislation has created a much
more serious problem because it has institutionalized “systemic
discrimination” against Canadian-born white males.

In summary, the report done by Rosalie Abella has created a Canadian
Holocaust. Its inaccurate conclusions have been used to elicit guilt
from Canadians, to justify Canada’s high immigration intake and to
intimidate those who question that high intake. Its effects may dwarf
the effects of the European Holocaust which Abella’s parents
escaped. For the record, Abella was born in a Displaced Person’s
Camp in Stuttgart, Germany on July 1, 1946. Her family came to Canada
as refugees in 1950.
To make up for the damage that Employment Equity (EE) laws have done,
Canada needs to conduct a sweeping investigation to determine the
number of people who have been hired because of these ill-considered
laws. The legislation has been implemented by not only federal,
provincial and municipal governments, but also by much of Canada’s
private sector.

As an introduction, we present a few examples (from data provided by
The Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat) of the effects of EE in
Canada’s federal civil service.

As of March 31 1999, about thirteen years after EE laws began, the
Public Service of Canada (PSC) employed 178,340 people. Of that total,
91,856 were women, 5124 were Aboriginals, 8137 were people with
disabilities, and 10,557 were persons in a Visible Minority Group. No
data was available to show the number of women and other groups
employed before 1999, but the fact that women in 1999 comprised over
half of the total number of federal employees is striking. However, it
was already evident that Visible Minorities (most of whom were
probably newly-arrived) were being granted more preference than
Aboriginals and the Disabled, most of whom were also probably
Canadian-born.

As of March 31, 2011, the Public Service of Canada (PSC) employed
202,631. Of that total, 111,051 were women, 9486 were Aboriginal,
11,388 were Persons with Disabilities, and 22,998 were Visible
Minorities.

It is worth noting that in the 1999–2011 period, the PSC increased
in size by 24,291. It is even more worth noting that Visible Minority
employees increased by 12,441, about half of the total increase. This
significant increase is probably a result of a concerted effort by the
Public Service of Canada (the PSC) to hire Visible Minorities. It
should be noted that the Visible Minority hiring is possibly even
larger than that reported because Visible Minority employees, in
applying for a PSC job, do not have to declare that they belong to a
Visible Minority.

Again, the raw numbers also show that Visible Minorities increased
their representation much more than Aboriginals and Persons with
Disabilities. .

Many Canadians would agree that the PSC should make a very strong
effort to hire Canada’s Aboriginals and its Disabled. However, many
would also say that giving preference to Visible Minorities (VM) who
are foreign -born. compounds the first mistake of bringing these
immigrants here. Most Canadians correctly believe that access to a job
is an essential part of being born here. Similarly, they think that
Canada should not be acting as an employment agency for the world’s
unemployed. By doing this, Canada inevitably denies jobs to
Canadian-born.

Another major concern that Canadians have about Employment Equity is
security. It is common sense that Canada should be very cautious about
people who come from countries which are interested in acquiring
secret, strategic information about Canadian high tech and resource
businesses, or about Canada and its NATO allies. But there is little
evidence that Canada has exercised caution is employing these people
in sensitive departments.

For example, it is worthwhile noting that the percentage of Visible
Minorities (VM) in departments such as Citizenship and Immigration is
high. This department makes major immigration policy decisions,
issues visas, and is supposed to uphold the interests of Mainstream
Canada. Yet, the percentage of Visible Minorities is 18.8% (850 of a
total of 4514 employees). How much is the presence of these VM
employees stifling the expression of very real concerns that
mainstream Canadian Citizenship and Immigration employees have?

In the Passport Department, where fraud has been a serious problem in
the past, the percentage of Visible Minorities is 19.5% (478 of a
total of 2447 employees). Anyone who has visited the Richmond, B.C.
Passport Office will be shocked to see that the staff is
overwhelmingly probably newly-arrived Chinese. Has this increased the
potential for fraud?

On the Immigration and Refugee Board, where crucial decisions are
being made about whether someone is to be granted refugee status and
eventual permission to bring in very large numbers of potentially fake
relatives, the percentage of Visible.Minorities is 26.8% (223 of a
total of 833 employees). Has anyone asked a question about this?

The percentage of Visible Minorities in Human Resources and Skills
Development may seem small at 12.7% , but note that this translates to
2935 of a total of 23,092 employees. This large number is part of a
department which allowed close to 400,000 Temporary Foreign Workers
(TFW’s) to work here in 2012. In the past few months, Canadians have
learned that this department has permitted Mainland Chinese miners to
be stealthily imported to fill TFW jobs which several hundred
Canadian applicants were denied. This case should make clearer the
point that employers are probably widely abusing the TFW program. Have
some employees with ethnic connections to these employers assisted
some of these employers?

The percentage of Visible Minorities employed in the Canada Border
Services Agency is also 12.7%, but the raw number is high (1750 out
of a total of 13,831 employees). This department is responsible for
investigating immigration fraud. It is no exaggeration to say that
immigration fraud is rampant, mainly because the backgrounds of most
of the immigrants who enter Canada are not being checked. We know that
even when fraud is reported, this department does not even bother to
investigate a very large amount of it. Has this department ever asked
whether the loyalties of some of its employees are more to their
country of origin than to Canada?

In summary, a sweeping investigation of the entire Employment Equity
program would give Canadians a much better picture of what has
occurred and probably produce convincing evidence that the Visible
Minority section of EE should never have been implemented and should
be ended ASAP. [IMMIGRATION WATCH, January 24, 2013]

_____________________________
Unsubscribe / Change Profile: http://ymlp257.net/ugmjhqsqgsgbbqgwmegguewwmw
Powered by YourMailingListProvider

<< Start < Prev 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 Next > End >>

Page 103 of 454

Media

Campaigns

Newsletters

Most Read