Terry Tremaine Update: Crown Requests a Delay in a Hearing About Delay

Written by Paul Fromm

Tuesday, 06 December 2011 05:13

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This email newsletter was sent to you in graphical HTML format. If you're seeing this version, your email program prefers plain text emails. You can read the original version online: http://ymlp218.net/z6zmgO -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Terry Tremaine Update: Crown Requests a Delay in a Hearing About Delay Terry Tremaine another of Richard Warman's victims -- a Sec. 13 (Internet censorship) complaint about his postings on STORMFRONT, Criminal Code Sec. 319 ("hate law") complaint for these and other postings, and a complaint to the University of Saskatchewan which cost him his job as a math instructor and left him penniless facing the human rights hearing -- has spent several years mired in a Richard Warman-instigated charge of hate. The Crown has had this complaint now for over four years. Douglas Christie, Mr. Tremaine's lawyer, on September 2, got the Saskatchewan Court of Queen's Bench to set December 16 as a date to hear his motion seeking that the charges be dropped due to the unconscionable delay. Proceedings have repeatedly been delayed as Crowns were changed, as if this file had been passed around like a hot potato. Saskatchewan's only previous adventure in the rarefied world of Sec. 319 thought control ended in their ignominious defeat in the Chief David Ahenakew case. Mr. Christie was also the Chief's lawyer. The motion for yet another delay will be heard December 9. This issue of delay is serious. A person is entitled to a speedy trial. Terry Tremaine has suffered a severe curtailment of his rights ever since he was charged. Initially, he was banned from using or owning a computer or accessing the Internet. These Stalinist conditions which would all but have denied him the ability to find a job or to work in his chosen career -- math and computer science -- were modified somewhat through four separate applications by Mr. Tremaine as his own counsel in court. He may now own a computer and access the Internet but many not post on White Nationalist sites. In other words, he's been stripped of his political rights without/before a trial. [Remember that, Stephen Harper, next time you criticize curtailment of the rights of dissidents in Red China or Iran.] In fact, Mr. Tremaine has been under these gag rules longer than the maximum jail time that could have been imposed after a conviction -- two years in prison. Truly, this is abuse BY process! It's widely known that Mr. Christie has had health issues of late. One wouldn't want to entertain the thought that this latest request for a delay might have anything to do with the Crown's calculations about his health. Paul Fromm Director CANADIAN ASSOCIATION FOR FREE EXPRESSION _____________________________ Unsubscribe / Change Profile: http://ymlp218.net/u.php?id=gmjhqsqgsgbbqguhh Powered by YourMailingListProvider

 

Terry Tremaine Update: Crown Requests a Delay in a Hearing About Delay

Written by Paul Fromm

Tuesday, 06 December 2011 05:09

*Terry Tremaine Update: Crown Requests a Delay in a Hearing About Delay* Terry Tremaine another of Richard Warman's victims -- a Sec. 13 (Internet censorship) complaint about his postings on STORMFRONT, Criminal Code Sec. 319 ("hate law") complaint for these and other postings, and a complaint to the University of Saskatchewan which cost him his job as a math instructor and left him penniless facing the human rights hearing -- has spent several years mired in a Richard Warman-instigated charge of hate. The Crown has had this complaint now for over four years. Douglas Christie, Mr. Tremaine's lawyer, on September 2, got the Saskatchewan Court of Queen's Bench to set December 16 as a date to hear his motion seeking that the charges be dropped due to the unconscionable delay. Proceedings have repeatedly been delayed as Crowns were changed, as if this file had been passed around like a hot potato. Saskatchewan's only previous adventure in the rarefied world of Sec. 319 thought control ended in their ignominious defeat in the Chief David Ahenakew case. Mr. Christie was also the Chief's lawyer. The motion for yet another delay will be heard December 9. This issue of delay is serious. A person is entitled to a speedy trial. Terry Tremaine has suffered a severe curtailment of his rights ever since he was charged. Initially, he was banned from using or owning a computer or accessing the Internet. These Stalinist conditions which would all but have denied him the ability to find a job or to work in his chosen career -- math and computer science -- were modified somewhat through four separate applications by Mr. Tremaine as his own counsel in court. He may now own a computer and access the Internet but many not post on White Nationalist sites. In other words, he's been stripped of his political rights without/before a trial. [Remember that, Stephen Harper, next time youcriticize curtailment of the rights of dissidents in Red China or Iran.] In fact, Mr. Tremaine has been under these gag rules longer than the maximum jail time that could have been imposed after a conviction -- two years in prison. Truly, this is abuse BY process! It's widely known that Mr. Christie has had health issues of late. One wouldn't want to entertain the thought that this latest request for a delay might have anything to do with the Crown's calculations about his health. Paul Fromm Director CANADIAN ASSOCIATION FOR FREE EXPRESSION

 

How do you tell the difference between a Canadian Police Officer, an Australian Polic

Written by Paul Fromm

Monday, 05 December 2011 07:40

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This email newsletter was sent to you in graphical HTML format. If you're seeing this version, your email program prefers plain text emails. You can read the original version online: http://ymlp268.net/z87MaP -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- How do you tell the difference between a Canadian Police Officer, an Australian Police Officer and an American Police Officer? QUESTION:You're on duty by yourself walking on a deserted street late at night. Suddenly, an armed man with a huge knife comes around the corner, locks eyes with you, screams obscenities, raises the knife, and lunges at you. You are carrying a Glock 40 and you are an expert shot, however you have only a split second to react before he reaches you. What do you do? ANSWER: CANADIAN POLICE OFFICER: Firstly the officer must consider the man's Human Rights. 1) Does the man look poor or oppressed? 2) Is he newly arrived in this country and does not yet understand the law? 3) Have I ever done anything to him that would inspire him to attack? 4) Am I dressed provocatively? 5) Could I run away? 6) Could I possibly swing my gun like a club and knock the knife out of his hand? 7) Should I try and negotiate with him to discuss his wrong doings? 8) Does the Glock have appropriate safety built into it? 9) Why am I carrying a loaded gun anyway, and what kind of message does this send to society? 10) Does he definitely want to kill me, or would he be content just to wound me? 11) If I were to grab his knees and hold on, would he still want to stab and kill me? 12) If I raise my gun and he turns and runs away, do I get blamed if he falls over, knocks his head and kills himself? . 13) If I shoot and wound him, and lose the subsequent court case, does he have the opportunity to sue me, cost me my job, my credibility and the loss of my family home? AUSTRALIAN POLICE OFFICER: BANG! AMERICAN POLICE OFFICER: BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! 'click'...Reload...BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! (Sergeant arrives at scene later and remarks: 'Nice grouping!'). _____________________________ Unsubscribe / Change Profile: http://ymlp268.net/u.php?id=gmjhqsqgsgbbqguhb Powered by YourMailingListProvider