Answering Peter Sutherland, International Bankster, Who Pushes Multicult & Immigratio

Written by Paul Fromm

Monday, 25 June 2012 06:54

Answering Peter Sutherland, International Bankster, Who Pushes Multicult & Immigration to Break European Homogeneity Stand up to Sutherland I think we all know that there has been a deliberate attempt to undermine the ethnic homogeneity of Western countries. Now a United Nations official has come out and openly advocated<http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-18519395>this as a policy: The EU should "do its best to undermine" the "homogeneity" of its member states, the UN's special representative for migration has said. Peter Sutherland told peers the future prosperity of many EU states depended on them becoming multicultural. He also suggested the UK government's immigration policy had no basis in international law. He was being quizzed by the Lords EU home affairs sub-committee which is investigating global migration. Who is Peter Sutherland? He is an Irishman linked to big business: Mr Sutherland, who is non-executive chairman of Goldman Sachs International and a former chairman of oil giant BP, heads the Global Forum on Migration and Development, which brings together representatives of 160 nations to share policy ideas. He told the House of Lords committee migration was a "crucial dynamic for economic growth" in some EU nations "however difficult it may be to explain this to the citizens of those states". Peter Sutherland puts forward two arguments for breaking down homogeneity in Western nations. The first is that it's necessary for prosperity, but the second is that it's a matter of individual freedom: "at the most basic level individuals should have a freedom of choice" about whether to come and study or work in another country. What are we to make of all this? First, I think the argument that you have to have open borders to do well economically isn't really what's behind the push to break down ethnic homogeneity. A clue that Peter Sutherland isn't really motivated by "prosperity" arguments is that he advocates that Europe accept anyone who wants to work or study there rather than targeting those with skills. If I expand the quote I gave above it reads: Mr Sutherland ... called on EU states to stop targeting "highly skilled" migrants, arguing that "at the most basic level individuals should have a freedom of choice" about whether to come and study or work in another country. If that were put into effect then the European taxpayer would just end up footing a much larger welfare bill. One of the wikileaks revelations<http://ozconservative.blogspot.com.au/2011/01/is-it-other-way-round.html>, for instance, was that 24% of Muslim men and 21% of Muslim women in the UK are living off disability pensions. Imagine if the Sutherland policy were put into effect and anyone could move to the UK. How would the massive pensions bill be paid for? What Mr Sutherland also ignores is that if there is no longer an ethnic loyalty and identity in a nation, then there is less to keep the best and brightest of the native population there. In other words, let's say Mr Sutherland got his way and in 50 years' time there was no longer a sense of ethnic English solidarity in England. Why then would a productive Englishman choose to remain in England? He might instead go to wherever the weather was nicest, or the pay was highest, or the cost of living lowest. So if radically open borders make no sense in terms of prosperity, then why push for them? Perhaps it's a case of multinational big business chafing against any types of restrictions on its operations. Perhaps those who see themselves as international movers and shakers see the more closed loyalties of the nation state as limiting the control of a globalist bureaucracy. Perhaps too it's the enduring influence of a right liberal ideology in which what is thought to matter is a self-determining life and so it's thought to be immoral for something predetermined, like ethnicity, to influence where we might choose as individuals to live or to work. The Peter Sutherlands of the world need to be resisted. Imagine if he got his way and everyone in the world had the right to move to England. It would, over time, drive down the quality of life in England until the point was reached that it was no longer such an attractive place to live in, and it would make those living in England rootless - disconnected from a particular culture and tradition. Posted by Mark Richardson <http://www.blogger.com/profile/15961688379656119701>at 2:25 PM<http://ozconservative.blogspot.com.au/2012/06/stand-up-to-sutherland.html> <http://www.blogger.com/email-post.g?blogID=6832901&postID=6094930062013270367><http://www.blogger.com/post-edit.g?blogID=6832901&postID=6094930062013270367&from=pencil> 10 comments: kman <http://www.blogger.com/profile/07620856650843941769> said*... * ** *Sutherland needs to have a chat with Richard Lamm former governor of Colorado, and the guy I wished had of run for POTUS because he is the most amazing man and understands exactly the pitfalls of multiculture and the the biggest lie on the planet -the benefits of cultural diversity. Everyone should read Dick Lamms his speach "I have a plan to destroy America" " I would then invent “multiculturalism” and encourage immigrants to maintain their own culture. I would make it an article of belief that all cultures are equal: that there are no cultural differences that are important. I would declare it an article of faith that the black and Hispanic dropout rate is only due to prejudice and discrimination by the majority. Every other explanation is out-of-bounds."....*

 

UN Migration Chief Calls for Ethnic Replacement of White Europeans

Written by Paul Fromm

Sunday, 24 June 2012 05:54

UN Migration Chief Calls for Ethnic Replacement of White EuropeansA member of the secretive, internationalist -- some say conspiratorial -- Bilderberggroup and non-executive chairman of megabankers Goldman Sachs and International and a former chairman of oil giant BP wants to hike up the Third World immigration flood into Europe to "undermine national sovereignty." (BBC News, June 21, 2012) "the EU should 'do its best to undermine" the "homogeneity' of its member states, the UN's special representative for migration has said. Peter Sutherland told peers the future prosperity of many EU states depended on them becoming multicultural. He also suggested the UK government's immigration policy had no basis in international law." The cheek of the White-hating internationalist! The UK government's immigration policy's basis should be in protecting the integrity of the British people. One gasps at the wild absurdity of the notion that many European lands can only remain prosperous by abolishing their own people, their own identity. The porcine Sutherland oozes contempt for the will of European peoples to keep their identities and not be swamped by the Third World: "He told the House of Lords committee migration was a 'crucial dynamic for economic growth' in some EU nations 'however difficult it may be to explain this to the citizens of those states.' An ageing or declining native population in countries like Germany or southern EU states was the 'key argument and, I hesitate to the use word because people have attacked it, for the development of multicultural states', he added. 'It's impossible to consider that the degree of homogeneity which is implied by the other argument can survive because states have to become more open states, in terms of the people who inhabit them. Just as the United Kingdom has demonstrated.'." The head swims at the arrogance and outright economic nonsense of these statements. Spain and Italy may have ageing populations but they have high unemployment rates. What jobs are the hordes being brought in to replace Europeans to do? Far better to have highly restrictive immigration, create good jobs for ones own youth, so that they have the economic base to confidently start a family. The European countries could then move to 2.1 children per woman of child bearing age --replacement. The BBC report continued: "Mr Sutherland recently argued, in a lecture to the London School of Economics, of which he is chairman, that there was a 'shift from states selecting migrants to migrants selecting states' and the EU's ability to compete at a 'global level was at risk." Here the internationalist seems to support people with a right to go anywhere they want. Funny, you hear the same scare tactics and empty arguments from the immigration lobby in Canada and the U.S.. We're told we must open our doors because we are in a desperate competition for super talented immigrants, Yet, who's flooding into Europe/Mostly low talented immigrants from the Moslem world! Who's flooding into the U.S.? Largely, unskilled people from Mexico? Who's flooding into Canada? Again skill and language challenged immigrants from India, China, the Philippines and elsewhere who, all studies show, are doing markedly worse than previous immigrants from Europe. In fact, former MP Herb Grubel, writing for the Fraser Institute revealed that the recent cohort of overwhelmingly Third World immigrants are a huge fiscal drain on Canada annually consuming nearly $25-billion more in tax dollars than they contribute. Wow! What a way to build an economy! Sutherland's comments highlight the highly subversive nature of the concept of multiculturalis *Paul Fromm* *Director* *CANADA FIRST IMMIGRATION REFORM COMMITTEE* [image: Peter Sutherland] *Peter Sutherland's global migration forum brings together 160 nations to discuss policy*

 

Hear Paul Fromm -- The Fighting Side of Me: Dealing With “Diversity”

Written by Paul Fromm

Saturday, 23 June 2012 07:46

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This email newsletter was sent to you in graphical HTML format. If you're seeing this version, your email program prefers plain text emails. You can read the original version online: http://ymlp344.net/zd1zg8 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- HEAR PAUL FROMM -- THE FIGHTING SIDE OF ME: DEALING WITH “DIVERSITY” ( HTTP://REASONRADIONETWORK.COM/20120612/THE-FIGHTING-SIDE-OF-ME-DEALING-WITH-DIVERSITY-2 ) June 12, 2012 Paul Fromm * … wonders why he doesn’t feel enriched by the sight of a man in a pumpkin orange robe and sherbet orange woollen cap at SF International Airport; * … blasts the “diversity” freak show at Obama’s “Gay Pride Month” at the White House, June 15, honouring the military. What must serious military rivals like the Red Chinese now think of the homo-friendly U.S. military? * … marvels at Native Indian ad telling how 100 tribes in California create “diversity” and creativity; * … lambasts the nonsense of the “Diversity and Inclusion Council” at Canadian accounting giant Deloitte Touche; * … dissects the causes behind phenomenon that 37% of American Negroes without a high school education are in prison. http://reasonradionetwork.com/20120529/the-fighting-side-of-me- ( http://reasonradionetwork.com/20120529/the-fighting-side-of-me-free-speech-is-fragile-in-canada-the-u-s )Dealing-With-“Diversity” _____________________________ Unsubscribe / Change Profile: http://ymlp344.net/ugmjhqsqgsgbbqgjewgguewwmw Powered by YourMailingListProvider