IT'S TIME TO KILL SEC. 13

Written by Paul Fromm

Friday, 24 July 2009 07:35

*It's Time to Kill Sec. 13* By Arthur Topham July 23, 2009 It might appear unusual for an old Hippie such as myself to be advocating "killing" things seeing as how I've spend the greater portion of my lifetime singing the theme-song of the 60's: LOVE & PEACE. But, I suppose there comes a time in every person's life when they are faced with certain decisions which, weighed in their fullness and measured against the alternatives that present themselves, require address. Such is the case with this dreadful and ominous threat to Canada's collective freedoms of speech and expression now embodied in Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act. Over the past couple of years my mind has been immersed in the subject. Having spent decades writing and researching and criticizing the machinations of those who have been conspiring to limit the individual freedoms of people around the world suddenly I was confronted with a new level of reality. Upon receiving word from the Canadian Human Rights Commission that I had been charged with committing the very crime which I'd spent so many years fighting against was, to use yet another expression of the 60s, "mind-blowing" to say the least. Since then it's been a steady and steep learning curve for me; one which, thanks to the fact that I can still publish my thoughts and ideas on the net, I have been able to share with people around the world. In that sense it's been a golden opportunity to share my perspective and the perspectives of others who feel the same way about freedom of speech and the reasons for why we're now being slammed front and center by the censors; those who obviously believe that silence is golden when it comes to criticism of certain elements of our Establishment who don't wish to become the focus of any media scrutiny or political analyses. One thing that has proven true over the past few years, whether the censorship advocates wish to acknowledge it or not, is the fact that increased awareness concerning the root causes of humanity's overall discontent is growing at an exponential rate thanks to the net. I felt this very strongly when I wrote the little article Killing the 100th Monkey back in January of 2008 outlining the phenomenon. It was happening big time then but in the past year and a half it has increased even further thanks to the actions of those who continually precipitate hatred and violence and terrorism and economic deception upon the defenseless peoples of the world using the guise of various government and international agencies to do so. For those who, for whatever reasons, haven't had the time or the inclination to investigate this burgeoning and blossoming of knowledge and information, it remains still a mystery as to why all the assorted confusing, contradictory factors which the mainstream media juggles and dangles before the glazed eyes and minds of the general public are not recognized for what they truly are: deception and subterfuge, not only with an agenda but also with an attitude (big time). This enigma of disparate, deliberate design, which the general populace – who rely upon the mainstream media for their information – is faced with (literally) every day, is being continually countered in the amazing world of the blogosphere or as I prefer to label it, Cyberspace, every minute of the day. Of course those who don't wish to see this growing awareness of first causes flourish try their best to denigrate it and label it as merely "anti-Semitic", "hate-filled", "racist" propaganda purposely designed to bring opprobrium and contempt upon those to whom all the criticism is being directed. As such they face a formidable challenge. It's as if all hell had suddenly broke loose for them. It's Pandora's Box maxing out on a combination of meth and viagra! It's the proverbial lesson encompassed in the metaphor of the little Dutch boy trying to hold back the rising flood tide by sticking his finger in the hole of the crumbling dike. In other words it's revelation time, come hell or high water. The OK Corral in digital format. The Quickening. And for Christians and others of a religious bent it's the beginning of the End Times. The start of mankind's Trials and Tribulations as we swiftly ascend either the stairway to Heaven or descend into the valley of Armageddon. What all of these assorted approaches to today's political and spiritual events create is a hodge-podge of positions that the censors are faced with having to address whether they wish to or not. And it is creating havoc within their ranks as we see them desperately attempt to address this growing resistance to their censorship methods. Using what now appear to most serious enquirers as worn-out cliche responses to the mountains of accusations and evidence currently confronting their actions the censors are forced to retreat into their one remaining safety zone – the monolithic government agencies that they surreptitiously created over the past decades to quell the growing, vociferous hordes of rabble who are now realizing they've been had big-time by these self-selected arbiters of public policy and basic human rights. High above the ramparts of their Commissions and Tribunals is raised the flag of their dominion and upon it, emblazoned in blood red letters upon a backdrop of the Red Shield, are the words: Section 13(1). Holding up in their castles of sand and sophistry they're in disarray and confusion, one hand not fully aware of what the other is doing. Their techniques and strategies are coming apart at the seams as the electronic world upon which they depend betrays their ignoble ends and their illegal, immoral acts. Every turn they make they're caught doing something they shouldn't be doing. Every statement they issue is immediately proven to be both transparent and filled with lies and half-truths. They're beginning to react like caged animals who sense deep within themselves their imminent demise and they're lashing out haphazardly at anyone who criticizes them. In other words their castle of corruption and deceit is under siege by the cyber-warriors of free speech and with each passing day they become more and more reactive and abusive in their methodology; more sinister and underhanded in their public outcries; more devious and denial-ridden in their overall demeanor. They've become, as the graphic image above this article portrays, like some alien, reptilian creature from another dimension of space that's suddenly manifested before our eyes and its vile and evil intent is now so ever-present as to be beyond question. The only remaining question is do we as a free and open and democratic society allow this creature to continue to thrash about and destroy more and more lives as it's purpose becomes recognizable beyond question or do we do the merciful thing and put it out of it's misery? The solution is obvious. It's time to kill section 13 and regain our nation. ----------------- [Editor's Note: I sincerely recommend going to the website of FreeDominion.com and reading through the following threads dealing with the issues of Section 13, the Human Rights Commissions and the Tribunals. There is also much in the way of discussion surrounding the case of Abrams v. RadicalPress.com that I think many Radical Readers would enjoy.] Please see: Censorship by Intimidation - Harry Abrams/Richard Warman http://www.freedominion.com.pa/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=120930 Post subject: Harry Abrams joins the FD debate... http://www.freedominion.com.pa/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=121039&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=0 Topham fails to make hard enough case in Penis Post http://www.freedominion.com.pa/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=120748 Freedom of Speech defended in Alberta Court http://www.freedominion.com.pa/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=121136 -----------------

 

TERRY TREMAINE'S CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE ADJOURNED INDEFINITELY: NO JAIL FOR INTERNET

Written by Paul Fromm

Friday, 24 July 2009 07:35

* Terry Tremaine's Contempt of Court Case Adjourned Indefinitely: No Jail for Internet Dissident* *REGINA.* They saw the quiet determination in Terry Tremaine's blue grey eyes and like certain soldiers seeing the cold steel glint of the bayonets, fled the fiedld of battle. Internet dissident Terry Tremaine (Mathdoktor99 on Stormfront) had given up his apartment, moved his goods into storage, eaten a hearty last breakfast and removed all but some cash and his health card and headed off to Federal Court this morning fully believing he might eat a supper of slops in a local jail. We arrived at the hearing. I spoke to a brief press conference and, then, Mr. Tremaine, reporter Barb Pacholik, and I headed up to Room 1600. It was locked. We were amazed. We learned that the day before Federal Court had granted the Canadian Human Rights Commission an adjournment *sine die*; that is, an indefinite postponement. Later in the day I contacted Canadian Human Rights Commission lawyer and prosecutor Daniel Poulin. He explained : "I truly do not want to put Mr. Tremaine in prison." However, he wants Mr. Tremaine to remove his National Socialist Party of Canada website. Contacted later in the day, lawyer Douglas Christie hailed the adjournment as a "real victory." Terry Tremaine had made it quite clear in discussions over the past month with Mr. Poulin that he was not afraid to go to jail. He does not want to knuckle under to Canada's Internet censorship. He welcomed an open court hearing where he could defend what he had posted and legitimate political commentary about urgent social and political issues. What was really happening? We suspect that, with media from coast to coast calling for the repeal of Sec. 13 (the Internet censorship provisions of the Canadian Human Rights Act), the CHRC and its new public relations advisors may not have relished tossing a gentle, law-abiding academic into prison for the non-violent expression of his political views. CAFE is pleased with the role we've played, reminding the media and all who'll listen that a CHRC prepared to jail a dissident, places Canada in the sordid company of tyrannies like Red China and Burma that jail people solely for the non-violent expression of their political views. -- *Paul Fromm, Director* *Contempt hearing for former University of Saskatchewan professor Terrence Cecil Tremaine postponed* By Barb Pacholik, Leader-PostJuly 23, 2009 8:01 PM REGINA — A former University of Saskatchewan lecturer accused of spreading hate messages with his Internet postings was taken by surprise Thursday in Regina when he arrived at his contempt hearing to learn it had been postponed. Terrence Cecil Tremaine showed up at the Federal Court hearing, along with a supporter who flew in from Ontario, only to learn it was not proceeding. A Federal Court judge had adjourned the matter two days earlier following an application by the Canadian Human Rights Commission, which decided earlier this year to pursue a contempt charge against Tremaine. “Bizarre,” said a frustrated Tremaine upon finding the locked hearing room. A new date has not been set. Commission lawyer Daniel Poulin said e-mails alerting Tremaine to the change were sent Wednesday. Poulin said his letter to the court seeking the adjournment indicated he “is presently in discussion with Mr. Tremaine, with possibilities of purging his contempt without going through with the procedure. I sincerely hope we can achieve this.” In 2007 a human rights tribunal found Tremaine had violated the Canadian Human Rights Act by making racist Internet postings. He was ordered to pay $4,000 and to halt such postings. At the time of the postings in 2004, Tremaine was working as a part-time university instructor in math and computer science. When the university became aware of the human rights complaint, Tremaine was terminated from his position in 2005. In March this year the commission took the rare step of pursuing a contempt charge, alleging that Tremaine was still posting racist and hateful commentary. Tremaine also faces a separate criminal charge in Regina of inciting hatred. That case is set for a preliminary hearing this fall. Paul Fromm, director of the Canadian Association for Free Expression, came to Regina Thursday to lend his support to Tremaine. He assisted in Tremaine’s defence at the tribunal hearing. Tremaine referred questions to Fromm, who argued free speech laws should be in interpreted broadly. “What we have is government censorship of ideas where truth is not a defence (and) intent is not a defence,” he said. “People should not have to have a lawyer by their side before they can put their views on the Internet.” The tribunal found Tremaine’s postings, on a white supremacist website, conveyed “extreme ill-will to the point of violence towards the targeted groups,” which included people of Jewish faith, blacks and other non-white minorities. [email protected] © Copyright (c) *The Regina Leader-Post*

 

PREFACE: ON THE 'RULE OF LAW' -- TERRY TREMAINE: NOTES ON SUBMISSIONS IN CONTEMPT OF

Written by Paul Fromm

Thursday, 23 July 2009 06:48

*Preface: On the 'Rule of Law' -- Terry Tremaine: Notes on Submissions in Contempt of Court Hearing in Regina, July 23, 2009* *[Censorship victim and potential political prisoner Terry Tremaine has written a powerful cri du coeur -- the heartfelt and passionate beliefs of an honest man. He goes into tomorrow's hearings under no illusions of quick victory. He is skeptical that he can even receive justice at the hands of our increasingly politicized courts. "I have no illusions about tomorrow," he told a rapt audience of CAFE supporters in Regina tonight. "The fix has been in from the very start." He told the audience that he was not afraid of jail. He recounted how, in discussions with Canadian Human Rights Commission lawyer, Daniel Poulin, he'd been told: "If you purge your website, we won't be asking for jail time." Mr. Tremaine, a thoughtful scholar, quick to smile, added?: "I was insulted, when he talked of purging my website. It was as if my ideas were a bunch of turds in the toilet. I was insulted that he seemed to be calling my writings and works of the past few years shit." Mr. Tremaine added that Poulin reminded him of the devil figure in old movies slyly whispering in his ear. Paul Fromm * * Preface: On the 'Rule of Law'* The Canadian Human Rights Commission (CHRC) has maintained a campaign of suppression against its political opponents under the guise of promoting 'human rights'. In my case they have pursued me from place to place, arranged for me to get fired from various jobs between 2005 and now, smeared my name in the media, had my bank accounts canceled, and even threatened employers with adverse media publicity unless they fired me. Such is the status of 'human rights' and the 'rule of law' under this current regime. ... *The CHRC Complaint* The CHRC began attacking me in April 2005. I received a registered letter on April 8, 2005 advising me that a 'human rights' complaint had been filed against me. What was my great offense? I had stated that communism was Jewish and that communism was essentially a plague. It had resulted in the death of millions of the best and brightest in the former Russian empire at the hands of the CHEKA, most of whom were Jews (a fact that was well known throughout the world at that time but conveniently forgotten since). It did not matter whether the content of my remarks were true. All that mattered was whether my writings had exposed certain privileged minorities to 'hatred and/or contempt'. I was shocked upon receiving the complaint. I had thought that all my remarks were fair social commentary. I admit that I used strong language but in light of the historical events I was discussing it was my belief that my remarks were in bounds. Not according to the CHRC, however! The CHRC, with Richard Warman as its front man, set about to destroy me. They attempted to make sure I could not find employment and that, if found, I would soon be fired. This has happened several times both before and after the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal (CHRT) hearing and their judgment against me. The fact that they began their campaign of destruction even prior to the hearing demonstrated to me that I had already been found guilty and that the upcoming hearing (in the grand tradition of the Soviet show trial) would just be a formality for appearances sake. At the hearing itself the CHRC even tried to deprive me of representation. The CHRT found me guilty, of course. No one has ever been found innocent at any of their show trials. I was levied a $4000 fine even though the tribunal knew I had no way to pay it and the CHRC together with Richard Warman had done everything in their power to ensure that I would become destitute. Such is the notion of fairness in the thinking of the 'human rights' commissars. The one goal of the human rights bureaucracy is to crush and grind under its heal all its political opponents. In my view, it has nothing to with securing human rights and everything to do with promoting a Zionist political agenda. Their activities represent the politicizing of the judicial process. This trend will continue until it is stopped. *The Judicial Appeal in Federal Court* I appealed the ruling of the CHRT in Federal Court. That process turned out to be a farce. The judge ruled against me and her written judgment seemed to rely on the most superficial reasoning and shallow understanding of the issues at stake. I was truly surprised! However, my surprise ended when I found out she was a star contributor to the Canadian Jewish Congress. In other words, she was an activist Jew. The fair hearing I thought I would receive in Federal Court had turned out to be an extension of the CHRT judicial farce. In Canada and elsewhere the phrase 'human rights' is taking on the unbearable stench of tyranny. This regime is attempting to replace our God-given and inalienable rights of free speech, free assembly, and self-defense with United Nations -style 'human rights' which can be granted with one hand and taken away with the other. *The CHRC as an Agent of a Foreign Power* Following the Federal Court ruling I did further research on the activities of the CHRC and discovered that that agency, supposedly an agency of OUR Canadian government, is actually acting as an agent ... in suppressing anti-Zionist political activity in Canada, the US, and elsewhere. In view of that fact it is no longer a surprise that many, perhaps most, of the CHRC's targets are people on both the right and left who are critical of the Zionist political agenda. Resistance to that agenda has been in the form of words, mostly on the Internet, and some low level political activity such as leafleting and small demonstrations. I had always been taught that is the way one is supposed to do it in a civilized society - i.e. peacefully through words and persuasion. Strategic resistance was to be for countries where peaceful resistance was not allowed. Unfortunately, here in Canada we are moving towards the point where strategic resistance to the Zionist agenda will be the only option available. When the CHRC began attacking me I went into a downward spiral eventually reaching the point where I became suicidal and had to seek treatment for severe depression. At some point I decided to start fighting back and have been doing so ever since. I emphasize that at present the tools of our struggle are words and persuasion. That is the correct way in a country that still enjoys some of the trappings of the civilization that our European ancestors brought here. If the CHRC and the co-opted courts are able to silence peaceful dissent they will eventually have to deal with strategic political struggle and that is something I hope this country never has to face. *Opposition to White Decline* Available statistics strongly suggest that the White race, defined as the race of people traditionally associated with Europe and the British Isles, is on a trajectory toward minority status by the middle of this century and virtual extinction by the end of the century. Countries with high birth rates are using formerly White countries as a dumping ground for their excess populations. I call this demographic genocide. That this is a deliberate policy being carried out by the social engineers with a globalist agenda is clear. Bill Clinton, in a speech given not long after leaving office, stated that he looked forward to a time when Whites are a minority in the US. Population experts have stated that the trend towards extinction will be irreversible long before the end of this century. That is why I consider the battle to preserve our people from such a fate to be of such urgency that all available efforts must be applied now. It is an imperative of Nature that each species secure its own existence and protect its own living space. As a former Mathematics lecturer I gave examples from population biology in the course I taught in Differential Equations. It can be shown within that subject that no two species can occupy the same environmental niche over the long term. Applied to a multi-racial society the implications are clear. Either the various races within a multi-racial context will merge to form a single uniformly brown mass of hybrids or they will fight each for its own bit of turf in a racial turf war. The first outcome implies the extinction of the White race and the second implies civil war and chaos. All White Nationalists support what is commonly called the 14 words: "We must secure the existence of our people and a future for White children". That I support the 14 words, as do all White Nationalists, was used against me at the CHRT hearing. Ms Warsame, a Black female from Africa, quoted the 14 words with obvious disdain in her voice which rose to a higher level of disdain and contempt as she quoted "a future for White children" as though such a notion that White children should have a future in this world is an idea worthy of the disdain and contempt in her voice. *Future Developments* A question I would like to address to the CHRC is "What do they hope to achieve?" Do they think that once they have suppressed all political dissent in Canada that they will have established a multi-racial utopia? Granted, there may be a period of silence for a while. That will be but the silence before the storm breaks. Our people will not go silently into the dark night of racial extinction. Our people will not simply submerge themselves willingly into the brown swamp of third-world biomass. There will be resistance and that resistance, unfortunately, will be, by necessity, strategic! *Charter Rights* My opponent (Daniel Poulin, a lawyer for the CHRC) has advised me in a telephone conversation that my Internet writings go beyond what the Charter of Rights allows. His comments reminded me of something penned by Thomas Paine, the man who literally wrote the book on the Rights of Man, who said that charters of rights are written not to give rights but to take them away. According to Paine, the true rights of man are inherent in him as a creature of God and are thus inalienable. No government can give or take away inalienable rights. The writers of the US Declaration of Independence were careful to state they were not intending to create rights which had not previously existed but were seeking to acknowledge rights that inhere in man as a creature of God. *Canada: The Orwellian Animal Farm* We are currently living and dying under the regime of political correctness – the new one-world civic religion of Equality. This new religion even has, in the alleged 'Holocaust', its own sacrificial lamb. The idea of equality within this new religion is a paradoxical thing. As George Orwell pointed out in his book *Animal Farm*, some groups are more equal than others – Jews and other minorities but mostly Jews. It has its own enforcers of correct dogma and those who violate the rules are treated as blasphemers and hauled before their special courts. The new sins within the one-world religion of Equality are racism, anti-Semitism, so-called homophobia (revulsion against the practice of homosexuality), and so-called sexism (failure to genuflect before the goddess of feminism). However, the greatest sin in the new one-world religion of Equality is to promote the interests of White people and seek to preserve OUR existence. *The Notion of Human Equality* In my judicial appeal of the CHRT ruling I stressed that the idea of human equality rests on nothing. Before we can determine whether a statement is true or false we need to know what it means. It turns out that the statement that all human beings are equal is either a tautology (true by definition) as in 'all triangles are equally triangular' or is false as in 'all triangles are equal as triangles'. In order to state whether two human beings are equal as human beings we need a means of determination such as we have for triangles (congruency). For human beings such a means does not exist. In Nature no two things above the molecular level are equal. No two snowflakes are equal and that applies to human beings as well. The US Declaration of Independence, written by Thomas Jefferson, states that it is self-evident that all men are created equal. However, *[Jefferson] was not a moron, and cannot have meant anything so absurd as is sometimes supposed. What he meant was that all Englishmen should be equal before the law. He was reacting against the class structure of English society and an aristocracy, of which the greater part had been created by kings and ennobled parvenus, often for the most discreditable services, so that socially and morally worthless individuals were given special privileges because they were descended from men who had, rightly or wrongly, been elevated to the peerage. Jefferson recognized, of course, the biologically inequality of all men: "There is a natural aristocracy among men. The grounds for this are virtue* and talents...There is also an artificial aristocracy, founded on wealth and birth, without either virtue or talents; for with these, it would belong in the first class." (*In Jefferson's time "virtue" still retained its proper meaning, denoting manly excellence, including courage and integrity as shown by both moral and intellectual honesty*. [footnote in original])(Revilo P. Oliver, *Who's for Democracy*? http://www.stormfront.org/rpo/DEMOCRAC.htm) The watchword of the French Revolution was Liberty, Equality, Fraternity. A little thought confirms that these three objectives are incompatible. Free men are not equal and equal men are not free. Equality must be imposed as we see in the current Canadian context. In the original ruling of the CHRT and reinforced by the Federal Court, it was stated that my writings do not constitute 'legitimate political discourse' because they do not 'promote equality'. By their own admission they have stated that only political opinions which promote 'equality' are to be viewed as legitimate. Without the ongoing enforcement of equality society could resolve itself into a natural hierarchy with a natural aristocracy based on moral integrity and natural talents as referred to in the above quoted paragraph. It is my view that successful societies approximate the ideal of merit based hierarchies but I am not allowed to have express that view according to the enforcers of 'equality'. The constant leveling required to enforce equality leads to intense political repression which was the ultimate fate of the French Revolution and the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia. The constant leveling requires the ongoing overthrow of the superior by means of the inferior. The enforcement of equality destroys both liberty and fraternity. That is Canada's fate under the current regime. *Summary* *To summarize, I request that the court dismiss the charge of contempt. My purpose in ignoring the cease and desist order was to address the urgent matter of impending White extinction and to argue against the new one-world religion of Equality. It is my profound concern that Canada will continue its slide into a nightmare of Political Correctness where only hypocrites and liars will have a voice. Therefore, I request that the court recognize my writings as fair social commentary.*