Campaigns
Newsletters
ARA-CALGARY HARASSES WN UNIVERSITY STUDENT |
Written by Paul Fromm |
Wednesday, 13 January 2010 10:12 |
*ARA-Calgary Harasses WN University Student* The campus of the University of Calgary has been blanketed by an inflammatory poster harassing and targetting a second year female student who has been an activist in the Aryan Guard. The group doing this is Anti-Racism Action, Calgary, apparently in conjunction with a website called Anti Racism Canada, which is run by anonymous people, although Richard Warman's legal documents seem to appear up there even before the printer's ink seems dry on them. The posters say, in parts: "Meet ... Natalie Sonne on Facebook and other sites, and 'Hiraeth' on Stormfront. and her own blog. .... Little Natalie's parents are paying for her education and evidently are not pleased about their little girl's involvement in far right politics. She's about 5'7" with naturally brown hair and is currently in her second year at the University of Calgary. Started in Business but switched to Computer Science. *If you see her she should be approached with disdain, mocking laughter, and much finger pointing. Feel free to express your own view-points on racism to her, as she is hear to learn." * Then it says, "with a little bit of help from our friends at ARC" and provides the link to that. It is signed ARA Calgary, with the email [email protected]. ARA-Calgary, some of whose circle assaulted peaceful marchers at last the March 21 White Pride Parade in Calgary, has been headed by a perennial Communist Party of Canada candidate Jason Devine. He ran most recently in the 2008 federal election in Calgary East, piling up a mere 323 votes and finishing dead last just 20,988 votes behind the Conservative winner. The poster would seem to clearly violate the University of Calgary's policy forbidding "personal harassment" which is defined thus: *"Personal harassment is harassment not based on any of the prohibited grounds as stated in human rights legislation but generally abusive, insulting and degrading conduct for which there is no legitimate purpose. Personal harassment can take a variety of forms. Obvious bullying behaviours include public humiliation; personal insults and name-calling; persistent criticism; spreading malicious rumours; freezing out, ignoring or excluding; and constantly undervaluing effort. Other less obvious bullying behaviours include removing areas of responsibility; deliberately sabotaging or impeding work performance; refusing to delegate; constantly changing work deadlines; withholding necessary information; over-monitoring, especially with malicious intent; setting up individuals to fail (example: impossible deadlines); blocking applications for leave/promotion; and instigating complaints from others to make the individual appear incompetent."* The Anti Racism Canada website has been featuring and baiting Miss Sonne for several months, publishing her pictures and emphasizing that she is a university student. This postering technique seems based on Richard Warman's strategy announced in a speech by the same name to a conference sponsored by the ARA inToronto in August, 2005 -- "Maximum Disruption : Shutting Down the Neo-Nazis By (Almost) Any Means Necessary." In 2006, a motley band of about 25 ARA, flying the flag of communist Cuba, arrived in a bus that an ARA sign thanked Richard Warman for paying for, and demonstrated outside the Port Credit townhouse of Paul Fromm, Director of the Canadian Association for Free Expression who had clashed with Warman as he defended many of Warman's victims in Sec. 13 Internet tribunals. The ARA twice leafletted Mr. Fromm's neighbours making wild and defamatory remarks. This is a tactic used by homosexual radicals called "outing" -- denouncing a person in front of his co-workers or neighbours in an effort to get them to ostracize, exclude or hurt that person. Warman later denied paying for the bus, but, signifcantly for such a litigious person who sues people who criticize him, as far as we know never sued the ARA for their supposed misinformation. Representations have been made to the university urging them to enforce their anti-personal harassment policy and protect Miss Sonne so that she can go about her business as a student. |
IT'S TIME TO STOP THE "REFUGEE" SCAM, SECURE OUR BORDERS & REPEAL "SINGH" |
Written by Paul Fromm |
Monday, 11 January 2010 09:50 |
*It's Time To Stop the "Refugee" Scam, Secure Canada's Borders & Repeal "Singh"* It's been 25 years since a hard-bitten Scottish socialist, feminist, and judicial interventionist Madam Justice Bertha Wilson wrote the Supreme Court ruling that has become known as the "Singh Decision." This inspired piece of meddling lunacy granted any scamster who managed to put his little toe on Canadian soil the right to claim "refugee" status. We had to give him an oral hearing and venues for appeal. Even better, the Supremos decided that illegals had all the rights as Canadians. Thus, a refugee claimant would receive welfare, medicare, dental care (which our own working poor do not get), legal aid, public housing and, of course, English or French and skills training all at taxpayers' expense. Prior to 1985, people flying in making refugee claims numbered in the low hundreds each year. Ever since thousands have poured in each year. The hearings and appeals stretch on for years. Meanwhile, the "claimants" scarf up welfare and other government services and cost us more 42-billion a year. More than 500,000 "refugees" have entered Canada this way since 1985. So nutty is the Singh Decision that should President Obama fly to Canada and say, "I'm a refugee," we'd have to give him a hearing, welfare, medicare, legal aid, and even job training. Common sense matters not. That the U.S. is a democracy doesn't matter. That he's the president wouldn't matter either. We'd be on the hook. Successive government have sought with little success to get some handle on the invasion. More recently, the Conservatives have slapped visa requirements on sources of particular abuse -- Mexico and the Czech Republic, where large numbers of Gypsies have decided to come to Canada claiming to be "refugees" from their democratic homeland. Now the Canadian Press (January 8, 2010) reports: "Ottawa is seriously considering imposing visa requirements on visitors from Hungary to cut off a growing flood of refugee applicants, mainly from the Roma community, The Canadian Press has learned. It would be the third such move in less than a year, after Canada imposed visas on visitors from Mexico and the Czech Republic last summer. ... Now, the Eastern European country is among the top three sources of refugee claimants. The number of claims made every month was usually between 20 and 40 immediately after the visa requirement was lifted in the spring of 2008. By the fall of 2009, the monthly total was about 200. While numbers for the last three months of the year have not yet been made public, they are expected to show another sharp increase. At the same time, the refugee board's approvals of the claims have plunged to zero, with many of the claimants withdrawing or abandoning their applications as they come up for processing." The visa requirement will penalize the vast majority of Hungarian visitors who are legitimately coming to visit friends of relatives. Parliament must help Canada regain control of our borders. The Government should introduce legislation using Sec. 33 of the Constitution -- the "notwithstanding" clause. Very simply, the legislation would say, "Notwithstanding the Singh Decision, no person shall obtain immigration or refugee status, unless they apply and are vetted abroad." Thus, Gypsies who think they have a legitimate claim would have to apply to the Canadian Embassy in Budapest. No more flying to Canada and feasting off the taxpayers for years on end. Ottawa considers visas for Hungarian visitors: report Last Updated: Friday, January 8, 2010 | 8:55 PM ET Comments68Recommend31 The Canadian Press Ottawa is seriously considering imposing visa requirements on visitors from Hungary to cut off a growing flood of refugee applicants, mainly from the Roma community, The Canadian Press has learned. It would be the third such move in less than a year, after Canada imposed visas on visitors from Mexico and the Czech Republic last summer. And it would risk provoking retaliation not just from Hungary but also from the much larger and more powerful European Union, which has already protested against the clampdown on Czech travellers. The number of refugee claims from Hungary has soared since last spring, according to data collected by the Immigration and Refugee Board. That's despite months of attempts by Hungarian and Canadian officials to find other ways to better manage the influx. Numbers began to rise after Canada lifted visa requirements in the spring of 2008, when Hungary joined the European Union. Since the spring of 2009, however, the steady increase turned into a flood. Immigration Minister Jason Kenney visited Budapest last June and urged his Hungarian counterparts to take steps. "He raised Canada's concerns about the growing number of asylum seekers going to Canada," said Alykhan Velshi, Kenney's spokesman. Velshi said Ottawa has no plans to impose visas right now. But he added that efforts to collaborate had not produced concrete results. "Thus far, unfortunately, the number has gone up." Now, the Eastern European country is among the top three sources of refugee claimants. The number of claims made every month was usually between 20 and 40 immediately after the visa requirement was lifted in the spring of 2008. By the fall of 2009, the monthly total was about 200. While numbers for the last three months of the year have not yet been made public, they are expected to show another sharp increase. At the same time, the refugee board's approvals of the claims have plunged to zero, with many of the claimants withdrawing or abandoning their applications as they come up for processing. |
HOME FOR WAIFS AND STRAYS |
Written by Paul Fromm |
Sunday, 10 January 2010 10:18 |
*Home For Waifs And Strays* "Canadian immigration and child welfare officials are in an unprecedented legal fight over the future of a St. Lucian teenager flown here on a one-way ticket by a family that doesn't want him back. * Kasim* (not his real name – this choking secrecy pervades government!) is now in the care of the *Children's Aid Society* *of Toronto*, which has gone to *Federal Court* in an attempt to prevent his deportation. The child welfare group does not believe Canada should send Kasim, 16, back to a family that is unfit to care for him. Federal officials, however, say that to keep Kasim here will only encourage people from impoverished countries to send and abandon their children in Canada. What's more, they say, separating Kasim from his family may do more harm than good. In a recent decision, *Judge* *Robert Mainville* agreed to put Kasim's deportation on hold while the *CAS* obtains an official report on his family and explores whether he can be placed elsewhere in St. Lucia. ... He called on federal officials to review their travel policies for unaccompanied minors, given that Kasim was 14 years old when he stepped off a plane alone in Toronto in August 2007. 'Clearly measures need to be taken to avoid similar situations in the future,' Mainville said, adding: *'There is no question of encouraging in any fashion or manner whatsoever the act of sending and abandoning foreign children in Canada*.' According to court documents, Kasim was placed on a plane by his mother and aunt with a one-way ticket to Canada. *After he landed in Toronto, Kasim went to live with his older brother, who had also arrived illegally*. In March 2008, police discovered that both brothers were without immigration status. The older brother, a young adult, was jailed by immigration authorities and later deported to St. Lucia. Because of his age, Kasim was placed in the *temporary *custody of the *Children's Aid Society of Toronto*. According to court documents, a child welfare worker then contacted Kasim's mother, who said she wanted him to remain in Canada since education and employment opportunities were so limited in St. Lucia." (*Canwest News*, December 27, 2009) And it's just that simple, Mum makes up her mind and Junior is our responsibility. Two more years of squabbling and he can apply to sponsor the entire family! [This article appears in the January, 2010 issue of the *CANADIAN IMMIGRATION HOTLINE*. Published monthly, the *CANADIAN IMMIGRATION HOTLINE*is available by subscription for $30 per year. You can subscribe by sending a cheque or VISA number and expiry date to *CANADIAN IMMIGRATION HOTLINE*, P.O. Box 332, Rexdale, ON., M9W 5L3.] |
Page 419 of 454
Powered by MMS Blog